Parametric Audio Encoding Using Dynamic Weight Estimates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-channel audio encoding and decoding systems face challenges in maintaining audio quality, particularly for out-of-phase signals, due to the suppression of non-aligned components during down-mixing, leading to reduced energy and artifacts, and require complex phase alignment methods that are not robust or efficient.

Innovation Solution

A decoder and encoder system that uses weighted combinations of channel signals with different amplitudes for each time-frequency interval, generating weight estimates from up-mix parametric data to recreate the original multi-channel audio signal, thereby mitigating out-of-phase issues and maintaining low complexity and data rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If passive down-mixing (simple averaging) is used, then the system complexity is low and ease of operation is high, but acoustic energy is substantially reduced and out-of-phase signal components are completely lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of down-mixing operationVSAvoidacoustic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the down-mixing weights dynamic rather than static. The weights are adjusted based on the measured inter-channel phase difference and correlation for each time-frequency tile, allowing the system to adapt to varying signal conditions and preserve energy for out-of-phase components when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the down-mixing process by introducing variable weights that depend on phase difference and correlation parameters. This allows the system to optimize energy preservation across different signal conditions while maintaining simplicity in the basic down-mixing structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If phase alignment is performed before summation, then audio quality is improved, but the system complexity increases and algorithmic delay is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for quality improvement (inter-channel phase difference and correlation parameters) and uses this extracted information to adjust down-mixing weights, avoiding the need for complex full-phase-alignment processing while maintaining audio quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial phase alignment by using phase difference information only to adjust the weights of the down-mixing operation rather than performing complete phase alignment of all signal components, reducing complexity while maintaining essential quality improvements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If different weights with different amplitudes are used for time-frequency intervals, then out-of-phase signal components are preserved and audio quality is improved, but more parametric data needs to be transmitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoiddata rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing parametric data (inter-channel phase difference and correlation parameters) serve multiple functions: they are used both for spatial audio reconstruction and for determining optimal down-mixing weights, eliminating the need for separate weight data transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the weight determination function with the existing parametric data processing, combining multiple functions (spatial reconstruction and weight optimization) into a unified approach that uses the same transmitted parameters for both purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9070358B2Parametric encoding and decoding
Publication Date: 2015.06.30 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US9070358B2 patent drawing
  • US9070358B2 patent drawing
  • US9070358B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An encoder for a multi-channel audio signal which comprises a down-mixer (201, 203, 205) for generating a down-mix as a combination of at least a first and second channel signal weighted by respectively a first and second weight with different amplitudes for at least some time-frequency intervals. Furthermore, a circuit (201, 203, 209) generates up-mix parametric data characterizing a relationship between the channel signals as well as characterizing the weights. A circuit generates weight estimates for the encoder weights from the up-mix parametric data; and comprises an up-mixer (407) which recreates the multi channel audio signal by up-mixing the down-mix in response to the up-mix parametric data, the first weight estimate and the second weight estimate. The up-mixing is dependent on the amplitude of at least one of the weight estimate(s).