Parametric Optimization Framework for Interpretable Power Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional algorithms for solving constrained optimization problems in power systems are computationally expensive and lack interpretability, making them difficult to implement and understand.

Innovation Solution

An algorithmic framework that converts constrained optimization problems into parametric optimization problems using quadratic penalty terms and translational parameters, allowing for efficient solution processes and optimized system configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional algorithms (simplex, dual-simplex, barrier, interior-point) are used to solve constrained optimization problems, then solution accuracy is maintained, but computational expense and implementation complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolution accuracyVSAvoidalgorithm implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the constrained optimization problem by changing the parameter representation - converting constraints into penalty terms with translational parameters. This allows the problem to be solved through parameter adjustment rather than complex constraint handling, reducing implementation complexity while maintaining solution accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary parametric optimization framework that mediates between the original constrained problem and the solution. By using penalty terms as intermediaries, the complex constraints are transformed into manageable computational components that preserve accuracy while simplifying implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional algorithms are used to solve constrained optimization problems, then optimal solutions are obtained, but computational time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization solution qualityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the problem parameters from constrained form to parametric penalty form, the patent enables faster computation. The translational parameters allow iterative refinement of solutions with reduced computational burden per iteration, maintaining solution quality while decreasing total computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary transformation of the optimization problem into parametric form before solving. This preliminary action of converting constraints to penalty terms with translational parameters prepares the problem for more efficient solution procedures, reducing the computational time required for obtaining reliable optimal solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional algorithms are used for optimization, then constraint satisfaction is achieved, but interpretability of the solution process decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstraint satisfactionVSAvoidalgorithm interpretability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The parametric optimization framework acts as an intermediary that provides interpretability. The translational parameters serve as interpretable intermediaries between the constraints and the solution, allowing human operators to understand how constraint satisfaction is achieved through parameter adjustment rather than black-box algorithmic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

By representing constraints through translational parameters in the penalty terms, the patent makes the constraint satisfaction process interpretable. The parameter changes provide a clear, understandable mechanism for how constraints are satisfied, enhancing ease of operation while maintaining manufacturing precision of constraint fulfillment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4625211A1System control utilizing algorithmic framework to solve linear and non-linear optimization problems
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • EP4625211A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4625211A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4625211A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Traditional algorithms for solving constrained optimization problems are complicated to implement, difficult to interpret, and require significant computational resources. Disclosed embodiments convert constrained optimization problems into parametric optimization problems, in which at least a subset of the constraints are converted into parametric quadratic penalty (PQP) terms that each depends on a translational parameter. The parametric optimization problem may be used for optimization in a power system (e.g., for optimal power flow, economic dispatch, etc.). When solving the parametric optimization problem, the translational parameters are updated to ensure convergence. The parametric optimization problem can be solved with reduced computational expense, using only a linear equation solver to solve a sequence of primal variables only, thereby reducing computational complexity and expense. In addition, the disclosed embodiments provide a means to incorporate constraints into machine-learning algorithms. The disclosed algorithmic framework also provides interpretability and insights for analysis.