Parental Control Intermediary for User Content

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing parental-control software struggles to effectively manage user-generated content on the internet, often resulting in false positives and negatives due to the difficulty in scanning and identifying inappropriate content, especially in formats like images and videos, and is cumbersome to maintain.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that involves receiving a request from a child to upload user-generated content, providing it to a guardian for approval, and applying the guardian's decision, which includes capturing transaction information, associating it with the upload attempt, and replaying this information to facilitate or block the upload based on the guardian's approval.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If parental-control software scans for keywords to block inappropriate content, then automatic content blocking is achieved, but false positives and false negatives increase due to benign uses of keywords and lack of keyword detection in some content types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic content blockingVSAvoidfalse positives and false negatives
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary review mechanism where content is first submitted by the child, then reviewed by the parent before being made public. This intermediary step (parental review) resolves the contradiction by providing human judgment that eliminates false positives and false negatives while maintaining automation through the system's automated content submission and decision enforcement mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If entire websites are blocked to prevent access to inappropriate content, then content safety is improved, but the solution becomes too coarse and blocks legitimate content as well

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent safetyVSAvoidcoarse blocking granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments content control from website blocking. Instead of blocking entire websites (coarse granularity), the system controls individual user-generated content items (fine granularity). Each content item can be independently reviewed and approved or blocked, allowing precise control that prevents harmful content while preserving access to legitimate content on the same platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If user-generated content is reviewed on a case-by-case basis, then content appropriateness is improved, but the process becomes prohibitively cumbersome for parents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent appropriatenessVSAvoidparental control maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by having the child initiate the content submission process through their own actions (posting, uploading, or attempting to post content). The system automatically captures transaction information and presents it to the parent for review, eliminating the need for parents to proactively monitor or manually check content. The system serves itself by automatically detecting, capturing, and presenting content for parental approval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Speed

If automated keyword scanning is used to identify inappropriate content, then scanning speed is improved, but measurement precision decreases due to inability to detect inappropriate content in images, videos, and other non-text formats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning speedVSAvoidcontent identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the parent as an intermediary who views the actual content (images, videos, text) and makes the final determination of appropriateness. This human intermediary compensates for the limitations of automated scanning by providing contextual understanding and visual inspection that machines cannot perform, thereby achieving high measurement precision across all content types while maintaining speed through automated content capture and presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9495547B1Systems and methods for applying parental-control approval decisions to user-generated content
Publication Date: 2016.11.15 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US9495547B1 patent drawing
  • US9495547B1 patent drawing
  • US9495547B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for applying parental-approval decisions to user-generated content. The method may include receiving, from a child, a request to upload user-generated content to the Internet. The method may also include providing the user-generated content to a guardian of the child and receiving, from the guardian of the child, a decision indicating whether the user-generated content is allowed to be uploaded to the Internet. The method may further include applying the decision of the guardian to the user-generated content. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.