Parental Policy Enforcement for Online Wish Lists

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Children often add items to their online wish lists that conflict with parental policies, leading to unwanted gifts and additional work for parents, as existing systems lack enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with parental preferences.

Innovation Solution

A parental policy enforcement system that allows parents to specify prohibited items, blocking their children from adding non-compliant items to wish lists and notifying them of attempts to do so, ensuring only approved items are included and purchased.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If children manage their own online wish lists, then they can select items of genuine interest to them, but they may add items that conflict with parental policies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechild's ability to select interesting itemsVSAvoiditems conflicting with parental policy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a parental policy enforcement system as an intermediary between the child's wish list management and the actual item selection. This mediator automatically filters items based on pre-defined parental policies, allowing children to freely select items of interest while preventing policy violations. The system acts as an automated gatekeeper that preserves child autonomy while enforcing parental constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system requires parents to pre-define their policies and prohibited items before the child begins adding items to the wish list. This preliminary action establishes clear boundaries in advance, allowing the child to freely explore and select items within those boundaries without real-time parental intervention. The policy framework is set up beforehand to guide subsequent item selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If parents manage wish lists for their children, then items comply with parental policy, but the items may not be of genuine interest to the children

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with parental policyVSAvoidchild's interest in selected items
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables children to independently manage and populate their own wish lists with items they are genuinely interested in. Rather than parents selecting items for children, the child performs the selection function themselves within policy boundaries. This self-service approach ensures items reflect the child's true interests while the automated enforcement system guarantees policy compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The parental policy enforcement system serves as an intermediary that allows child autonomy in item selection while automatically ensuring policy compliance. The mediator filters and approves items based on pre-set rules, eliminating the need for direct parental management while maintaining policy adherence and preserving child interest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If children can freely add items to wish lists without restrictions, then the process is simple and convenient, but unwanted gifts are purchased requiring returns and exchanges

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of wish list managementVSAvoidtime for returns and exchanges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Parents pre-define their policies and prohibited items before the child begins adding items to the wish list. This preliminary configuration establishes clear boundaries that automatically guide item selection, preventing unwanted items from being added in the first place. The upfront effort of setting policies eliminates subsequent time-wasting returns and exchanges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated enforcement system acts as an intermediary that silently filters items in real-time as the child builds the wish list. This transparent process maintains the simplicity and convenience of child-led wish list management while automatically preventing policy violations, thus avoiding the need for returns and exchanges without adding operational complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8762229B1Parental policy based online wish lists
Publication Date: 2014.06.24 GEN DIGITAL INC
  • US8762229B1 patent drawing
  • US8762229B1 patent drawing
  • US8762229B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A parental policy is enforced for online purchases. A parent enters a parental policy indicating items that are prohibited for a child. When the child attempts to add an item to a wish list, it is determined whether the item is permitted according to the policy. If so, the addition of the item to the wish list is allowed to proceed. If the policy prohibits the item, the addition of the item to the wish list is blocked. Additionally, the parent can be informed (via email, telephone, etc.) of the attempt to add the item to the wish list. The same logic can be applied to attempts to purchase items for children, or attempts to purchase items by children.