Erasure-Coded Parity Updates With Threshold Consensus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing erasure coded data storage systems face inefficiencies during the update process, as small changes to the original data result in the regeneration of a large amount of parity data, leading to time-consuming and resource-intensive updates.

Innovation Solution

Implementing efficient consensus protocols in a data storage system where a leader data storage device generates and transmits updated parity data, allowing only the affected sections of parity data to be updated, and only committing the update once a threshold number of parity devices have acknowledged, thereby minimizing the data that needs to be rewritten.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If erasure coded parity data is used to protect against data loss, then data reliability is improved, but the amount of parity data that needs to be regenerated during updates increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoidamount of parity data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments parity data into multiple parity data subsections, where each subsection corresponds to a specific section of the data set. This segmentation allows only the affected parity data subsection to be updated when a particular data section changes, rather than regenerating all parity data. The leader data storage device identifies which specific parity subsection needs updating and transmits only that portion to the relevant parity storage device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and updates only the necessary portion of parity data (the affected parity data subsection) rather than processing the entire parity data set. When update data is received for a specific data section, the system extracts only the corresponding parity subsection that needs to be regenerated, leaving the rest of the parity data unchanged and in place.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Stability of the object's composition

If all parity data is regenerated for small data updates, then data consistency is maintained, but update time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting parity data into subsections tied to specific data sections, the system enables selective updates. When a small portion of data changes, only the corresponding parity subsection is regenerated and updated, maintaining data consistency for the changed portion while avoiding unnecessary regeneration of unchanged parity data, thus significantly reducing update time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by updating only the necessary parity data subsection rather than the complete parity data set. This partial update approach maintains sufficient consistency for the updated data section while avoiding the excessive time cost of regenerating all parity data, achieving an optimal balance between consistency and update efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If a consensus protocol is implemented to ensure update reliability, then data integrity is improved, but the complexity of the update process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidupdate process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The leader data storage device serves as an intermediary that coordinates the update process. It receives update data, generates the updated parity data subsection, transmits it to the appropriate parity storage device, and manages the consensus protocol. This intermediary approach centralizes coordination logic, simplifying the overall system architecture while maintaining update reliability through structured communication and acknowledgment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where parity storage devices send update notifications back to the leader data storage device to confirm successful updates. This feedback loop ensures data integrity by verifying that parity data subsections were correctly updated, while the structured feedback process manages complexity through clear, defined communication protocols rather than distributed complex coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10289489B2Update efficient consensus protocols for erasure coded data stores
Publication Date: 2019.05.14 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10289489B2 patent drawing
  • US10289489B2 patent drawing
  • US10289489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technology is provided for updating a data set at a data storage system. In an example storage system, the system stores a data set in a plurality of data storage devices. The system stores parity data at a plurality of parity devices. The system receives update data from a client system for a first section of the data set. The system generates updated parity data based on an original version of the first section of the data set and the update data. The system transmits update parity data to the plurality of parity devices. The system receives update notifications from a plurality of parity devices. The system determines that update notifications have been received from at least a threshold number of parity devices in the plurality of parity devices. In response, the system updates the first section of the data set at the leader data storage device.