Parked Vehicle Virtual Bumper Using Sensor Ranges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automotive safety systems do not effectively protect parked vehicles from impacts when the ignition is off, as they lack continuous monitoring and warning mechanisms for objects approaching the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A parked vehicle protection system utilizing a plurality of sensors and an electronic control unit to monitor the exterior area, provide external warnings through flashing lights and horn alerts, and capture images of objects within specific ranges, with alerts sent to the vehicle owner if contact is made.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a parked vehicle protection system with sensors, cameras, and warning devices is implemented, then vehicle safety and collision prevention capability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system is divided into functional modules: sensor array for detection, ECU for processing, warning devices (lights and horn) for alerting, and camera for evidence capture. Each module operates independently but coordinates through the ECU, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor array serves multiple functions: detecting objects in the vicinity, determining object range, and identifying potential collision threats. The same sensor system operates both when the vehicle is parked and when in motion, making the detection infrastructure universal across different vehicle states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and cameras are added to monitor the exterior area, then detection precision and warning effectiveness are improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection precisionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor array and camera operate in periodic scanning cycles rather than continuous monitoring. The ECU activates sensors to detect objects, processes the data, triggers warnings when needed, and then returns to standby mode. This periodic operation maintains high detection precision while significantly reducing energy consumption during parked vehicle monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection with the sensor array before activating more energy-intensive components like the camera and warning devices. Only when an object is detected within a certain range does the system escalate to full monitoring and warning modes, optimizing energy usage based on threat level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system provides multiple warning levels (first and second external warnings), then collision prevention effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention effectivenessVSAvoidwarning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different warning devices are activated based on the detected object's range and threat level. The first external warning uses less intrusive methods (e.g., visual lights only), while the second external warning employs more aggressive alerting (e.g., horn and lights). This localized quality approach provides graduated response appropriate to each situation without requiring all devices to operate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The warning system dynamically adjusts its response based on real-time sensor data. As an object approaches the vehicle, the system transitions from no warning to first warning to second warning, creating a dynamic, adaptive response that improves collision prevention while managing system complexity through conditional logic rather than fixed multi-device operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9296335B2Standby virtual bumper for parked vehicle protection
Publication Date: 2016.03.29 CONTINENTAL AUTONOMOUS MOBILITY US LLC
  • US9296335B2 patent drawing
  • US9296335B2 patent drawing
  • US9296335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of providing parked vehicle protection comprises determining if a vehicle ignition is in an off position and monitoring an exterior area proximate to a vehicle with a plurality of sensors when the vehicle ignition is off to detect an object proximate to the vehicle. The ECU determines whether the object is within a first object range and provides a first external warning when the object is within the first object range and determines whether the object is within a second object range and provides a second external warning when the object is within the second object range.