Personalized Parking Recommendation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current parking systems do not effectively account for individual user preferences and behaviors when recommending parking spots, leading to suboptimal choices based on factors beyond location and price, such as comfort with parallel parking or weather conditions.

Innovation Solution

A system that tracks and learns a user's parking behavior through vehicle sensors and user feedback to provide personalized parking recommendations based on their specific preferences and historical data, adjusting for factors like vehicle type, weather, and ambient conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides generic parking recommendations based only on location and price, then the system complexity is low, but user satisfaction deteriorates because users have individual preferences and behaviors that are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of parking recommendationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting user feedback and behavioral data during the parking selection process. Sensors track user interactions with parking options, and this data is stored for future personalization. This preliminary data collection enables the system to adapt recommendations without requiring complex real-time analysis of user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user responses to parking recommendations are captured and used to refine future suggestions. The feedback loop allows the system to learn from user decisions (whether they parked at the suggested location or chose alternatives) and continuously improve personalization while maintaining manageable system complexity through iterative learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system collects and analyzes extensive user behavior data to personalize recommendations, then user satisfaction improves, but the loss of information and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoiddata processing burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant features from extensive user behavior data for personalization purposes. Rather than processing all collected data, the system identifies and utilizes key patterns such as preferred parking locations, price sensitivity, and maneuver preferences, thereby reducing the data processing burden while maintaining effective personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of data analysis to different aspects of parking recommendations. Not all user behaviors are treated equally - the system focuses computational resources on the most influential factors for each user's parking preferences, optimizing the balance between personalization quality and data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors user parking behavior in real-time to learn preferences, then the accuracy of recommendations improves, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking behavior tracking accuracyVSAvoidenergy consumption for data collection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by collecting detailed parking behavior data at specific intervals rather than continuously. Sensors monitor user interactions with parking recommendations and actual parking outcomes at key moments, reducing energy consumption while maintaining sufficient measurement precision to learn user preferences effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring by focusing data collection on the most critical aspects of parking behavior that significantly influence recommendation accuracy. Rather than exhaustively tracking all possible user actions, the system monitors key events such as recommendation acceptance/rejection and final parking location, achieving good measurement precision with reduced energy expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9666074B2Method and system for vehicle parking
Publication Date: 2017.05.30 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US9666074B2 patent drawing
  • US9666074B2 patent drawing
  • US9666074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A request to identify a parking spot is received. A response to the request, including an identification of at least one available parking spot, is provided. A parking spot selected from the response is identified. Data relating to the selected spot are collected. A user profile based on the collected data is updated.