Parking Validation Mat for Precise Autonomous Vehicle Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous parking systems lack a reliable method to validate the correct positioning of vehicles for successful autonomous parking maneuvers, particularly in narrow spaces where manual alignment is difficult.

Innovation Solution

A mat with predefined markings and an adjustable system for simulating various parking space dimensions, allowing vehicles to be positioned accurately for testing the autonomous parking function, combined with a method using aerial views for precise alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual alignment methods are used for autonomous parking validation, then the validation process becomes complex and time-consuming, but the positioning accuracy is insufficient for narrow parking spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidvalidation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a positioning mat as an intermediary tool between the vehicle and the parking space. The mat contains predefined markings that serve as reference points for both longitudinal and angular positioning. This intermediary device simplifies the validation process by providing visual guides that eliminate complex manual alignment procedures while ensuring high positioning accuracy for autonomous parking validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The positioning mat is prepared in advance with pre-calculated markings for various angular offsets (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°) and longitudinal offsets. These preliminary markings are created based on geometric calculations before the actual validation process, allowing the testing procedure to directly follow the visual guides without performing complex alignment calculations during testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If the parking space dimensions are fixed, then the validation setup is simple, but the system cannot test various parking space sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking space size adaptabilityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning mat is divided into multiple removable tiles that can be assembled in different configurations. Each tile contains specific markings, and by rearranging the tiles, the mat can adapt to different parking space dimensions and angular offsets. This segmentation allows the same basic component (tiles) to serve multiple validation scenarios without requiring completely different setups for each parking space size

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The positioning mat is designed as a universal tool that can validate autonomous parking functions across multiple parking space configurations. By incorporating markings for various angular offsets and using removable tiles that can be reconfigured, a single mat design serves multiple validation purposes, eliminating the need for separate validation tools for each parking space dimension

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4691884A1Mat, system and method for validating an autonomous parking function
Publication Date: 2026.02.11 AMPERE SAS
  • EP4691884A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4691884A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4691884A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

One aspect of the invention relates to a mat (100) for validating an autonomous parking function implemented on a vehicle (301) allowing the vehicle (301) to park autonomously in a parking space (300), the mat (100) comprising a plurality of first markings (101) intersecting at a first point (P), each first marking (101) comprising a first line (1011) and a second line (1012) intersecting said first point (P), the second line (1012) being perpendicular to the first line (1011), each first marking (101) being offset by a predefined angle with respect to a first reference marking (1010) among the plurality of first markings (101).