Pars Interarticularis Clamp for Spinal Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for pars interarticularis fractures, such as bracing and rest, often result in chronic pain and re-injury, and conventional surgical methods like spinal fusion are invasive, lead to mobility loss, and have variable success, with a high risk of re-injury and long recovery times.

Innovation Solution

A minimally invasive spinal stabilization system using a pars interarticularis clamp that applies compressional force to the fracture site, allowing direct bone grafting and stabilization without fusing the vertebrae, enabling quicker recovery and reduced risk of re-injury, utilizing a pars clamp with a pedicle screw and laminar hook for secure fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bracing and rest treatment is used for pars interarticularis fractures, then the fracture can heal or stabilize, but the treatment duration is long (6-12 weeks) and patients often develop chronic pain and re-injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture healing reliabilityVSAvoidtreatment duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the treatment approach by applying compression force specifically to the fracture site through a clamp device, rather than relying on global bracing of the entire spine. This localized intervention accelerates healing while minimizing overall treatment time and maintaining mobility in non-fractured regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device applies compression force early in the healing process to stabilize the fracture site immediately, creating optimal conditions for bone healing from the outset. This preliminary stabilization prevents the chronic pain and re-injury that typically develop after prolonged rest periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If spinal fusion surgery is performed to treat chronic spondylolysis, then stability is improved and pain is reduced, but mobility is lost and the procedure is highly invasive with long recovery

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidsurgical invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the essential function of stabilization from the complex spinal fusion procedure. By isolating and treating only the fractured pars interarticularis site with a clamp device, the device provides stability without requiring the extensive bone fusion and hardware implantation of traditional surgery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The device applies stabilization locally at the fracture site rather than fusing the entire motion segment. The clamp provides targeted compression and stability to the pars interarticularis while leaving the facet joints and surrounding structures mobile and unfused.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If conventional surgical methods are used to stabilize the fracture, then the fracture site is secured, but the risk of re-injury remains high and recovery time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture stabilizationVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device changes the mechanical parameters at the fracture site by applying controlled compression force that optimizes bone healing conditions. This parameter adjustment accelerates the healing process and reduces recovery time while maintaining reliable stabilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The clamp device provides dynamic stabilization that allows controlled motion at the fracture site while maintaining compression. This dynamic approach promotes healing faster than rigid fixation while preventing re-injury better than passive bracing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If young athletes undergo prolonged rest and bracing treatment, then the fracture may heal, but their athletic career and physical function are significantly limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture healingVSAvoidathletic function
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the immobilization requirement by stabilizing only the fractured pars interarticularis while allowing the rest of the spine and athletic function to remain active. This localized treatment enables athletes to maintain productivity during the healing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device enables continuous athletic training and physical activity during the healing process by providing sufficient stabilization without requiring prolonged rest. The useful action of athletic training continues uninterrupted while the fracture heals under controlled compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a quick, reliable, and minimally invasive treatment that allows athletes to return to sports within three months, maintains joint mobility, and reduces the need for future spinal fusion, while providing continuous stabilization and preventing re-injury.

Implementation Method 1

applies compressional force to the fracture site

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompressional force: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3962381B1Devices for treating spinal stress fractures
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 DATTA DEVIN
  • EP3962381B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3962381B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3962381B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A spinal stabilization system may include at least one pedicle screw comprising a threaded base to be connected to a superior pedicle of a vertebra and a screw head attached to the threaded base. The system may further include at least one pars interarticularis clamp comprising an elongate body defining a screw head connection point to be connected to the screw head of the pedicle screw, and a laminar hook coupled to the elongate body and configured to wrap around an edge of the lamina and compress the pars interarticularis of the vertebra when the screw head connection point is connected to the screw head.