Parse Tree Span Judgement for Medical Text Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in accurately distinguishing between hypothetical and factual statements in medical texts, which can lead to erroneous treatment recommendations, as they often contain both types of information, and existing methods lack a generalizable approach to differentiate between them.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a hybrid approach using specially constructed dictionary data structures and parse trees to identify and annotate hypothetical and factual spans within medical texts, allowing for the differentiation between ignore triggers and confirm triggers, enabling the cognitive system to accurately distinguish between hypothetical and factual content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current systems process medical texts without distinguishing hypothetical and factual statements, then processing speed is maintained, but accuracy of treatment recommendations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of treatment recommendationsVSAvoidcomplexity of text processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments medical text into distinct hypothetical and factual spans using parse tree analysis and trigger word identification. By dividing the text processing task into separate classification categories (hypothetical vs. factual), the system can accurately distinguish between statement types while maintaining manageable processing complexity through structured segmentation of the analysis workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary classification layer that analyzes trigger words and parse tree structures to determine whether statements are hypothetical or factual. This intermediary analysis step acts as a mediator between raw text input and treatment recommendation output, enabling accurate differentiation without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system includes both hypothetical and factual information without differentiation, then information completeness is maintained, but reliability of treatment decisions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of treatment decisionsVSAvoidloss of contextual information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality differentiation by tagging specific spans of text with their epistemic status (hypothetical or factual) while preserving the complete original text. This allows the system to maintain full information content while applying different reliability weights to different portions of the text based on their local classification, ensuring treatment decisions rely primarily on factual information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the system uses simple text processing without span evaluation, then processing efficiency is maintained, but measurement precision of statement type differentiation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of statement type differentiationVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing text into parse tree structures and identifying potential trigger words before conducting the hypothetical/factual classification. This preliminary structuring of the text data enables more precise statement type differentiation while maintaining processing efficiency through organized, pre-prepared text representations that facilitate faster analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11275892B2Traversal-based sentence span judgements
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11275892B2 patent drawing
  • US11275892B2 patent drawing
  • US11275892B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer program product for using a natural language processor to find nodes in a span include providing a parse tree including a trigger node, a first target node connected to the trigger node by a first edge, and a second target node connected to the first target node by a second edge, wherein first trigger node includes a first attribute and a second attribute, and wherein the target node includes a third attribute and a fourth attribute. Further included are recording the first, second, third, and fourth attributes in a first tree table; creating a first consideration table from the first tree table, the first consideration table including the first, second, third, and fourth attributes; and evaluating the first target node to determine whether the first node belongs in a first span that includes the first trigger node.