Machine Learning Part Assessment Beyond Nominal Tolerances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing the quality of manufactured gas turbine engine components, such as integrally bladed rotors, rely solely on geometric tolerances, leading to the rejection of functionally tolerant parts that fall outside nominal drawing limits.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing machine learning and physical testing to evaluate components at multiple locations, comparing generated data to training data to determine functional tolerance, ensuring components meet functional dimensions before acceptance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual inspection of dimensions is used to assess component quality, then manufacturing precision can be verified against nominal tolerances, but functionally tolerant parts outside nominal limits are incorrectly rejected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional tolerance verificationVSAvoidfunctional tolerance assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the assessment from checking against fixed nominal tolerances to evaluating functional performance parameters. The machine learning model assesses whether parts meet functional requirements rather than strict geometric limits, allowing functionally tolerant parts to be accepted even if outside nominal dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual dimensional inspection with an automated machine learning-based assessment system. This substitution enables more sophisticated evaluation that considers functional tolerance rather than just geometric compliance, improving the accuracy of quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If machine learning assessment is implemented, then evaluation speed and accuracy are enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine learning models that have been trained on historical assessment data to create a virtual assessment system. This copied knowledge from training data enables rapid evaluation without requiring complex physical testing infrastructure, achieving high evaluation speed while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary training of machine learning models using historical assessment data before actual quality assessment. This preliminary action creates a ready-to-use assessment system that can rapidly evaluate parts without requiring complex real-time analysis, improving evaluation speed while the complexity is managed during the offline training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250276813A1Rapid part assessment utilizing machine learning
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US20250276813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250276813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of assessing the quality of a manufactured component includes the steps of manufacturing a component and generating data at each of a plurality locations through the component. The generated data is passed to a machine learning branch wherein the generated data is compared to training data at each of the plurality of locations to determine whether the component is of functionally tolerant dimensions at each of the plurality of locations. The manufactured component is accepted should the component be within functionally tolerant dimensions at each of the plurality of locations, and the component is rejected if the component fails to be within functionally tolerant dimensions respectively, at each of the plurality of locations. A system is also disclosed.