Part Build Orientation for Anisotropic Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additively manufactured parts often exhibit anisotropic material and structural properties, making their strength and stability direction-dependent, which can be insufficient for specific applications due to manufacturing limitations.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine the optimal orientation of parts during additive manufacturing by analyzing the direction dependence of mechanical properties using numerical simulations or empirical methods, allowing for the selection of preferred orientations that optimize properties like tensile strength, pressure resistance, and surface roughness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to produce parts, then manufacturing flexibility and complexity handling are improved, but material properties become anisotropic and direction-dependent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial property consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing FEM simulations and stress analysis before the actual additive manufacturing process to determine the optimal build orientation. This pre-planning allows the anisotropic material properties to be accounted for in advance, ensuring that the part geometry and orientation are optimized to compensate for directional strength variations, thus maintaining reliability while preserving manufacturing flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If part orientation is optimized for strength in one direction, then mechanical properties in that direction are improved, but properties in other directions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmulti-directional performance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by performing localized stress analysis using FEM simulations to identify specific regions where strength optimization is most critical. Rather than uniformly optimizing for all directions, the method determines the optimal build orientation based on the local stress states and geometric features of specific part regions, allowing different areas to have different orientation requirements while maintaining overall part performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically evaluating multiple build orientations and selecting the optimal one based on simulated mechanical properties. The method changes the orientation parameters (build angles, direction vectors) and uses FEM analysis to predict how each orientation affects tensile strength, pressure resistance, and other mechanical properties, thereby optimizing strength while being aware of trade-offs in other directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If build orientation is fixed by manufacturing constraints, then manufacturing process simplicity is improved, but part performance for specific applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidproperty optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by determining the optimal build orientation through FEM simulations and stress analysis before committing to the manufacturing process. This pre-optimization step ensures that the selected orientation maximizes mechanical properties for the specific application while still being manufacturable, rather than accepting suboptimal orientations imposed by fixed manufacturing constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the build orientation a variable parameter that can be optimized based on the specific part geometry, material properties, and application requirements. Rather than using a fixed build orientation for all parts, the method dynamically determines the optimal orientation for each specific case through simulation and analysis, allowing the manufacturing process to adapt to different performance requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10908589B2Method for determining the orientation of a part to be additively manufactured, and computer-readable medium
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG
  • US10908589B2 patent drawing
  • US10908589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining the orientation of a part that is to be additively manufactured includes providing a geometry for the part to be additively manufactured, defining a property of the part to be additively manufactured, analyzing a directional dependency of the property in accordance with the geometry of the part, and determining a preferred orientation of the part to be additively manufactured in an additive manufacturing plant on the basis of the analysis of the directional dependency.