Partial Address Validation for Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current online purchasing systems face challenges in validating addresses during transactions, leading to potential fraud and erroneous rejections due to the lack of exact matches and the inability to process transactions using alternative payment methods, which limits flexibility for both buyers and merchants.

Innovation Solution

An automatic address validation system that receives an identifier and a portion of a postal address, searches for associated accounts, and communicates confirmation or rejection to merchants, allowing for flexible payment options and enhanced security through token generation and validation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If exact match validation is used for address verification, then fraud prevention is improved, but false rejections increase due to minor mistakes or alternative spellings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud preventionVSAvoidtransaction completion rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the validation parameter from requiring exact match to accepting partial match of the postal address. Instead of comparing the entire address string for exact equality, the system validates that a portion of the supplied address matches the billing address on file, thereby reducing false rejections while maintaining fraud prevention capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by validating only a portion of the postal address rather than requiring complete exact match. This partial validation approach allows transactions to proceed when the essential identifying portion of the address matches, even if other parts differ due to spelling variations or minor errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If AVS is used for credit card purchases, then address verification is improved, but flexibility is reduced for buyers using alternative payment methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress verificationVSAvoidpayment method flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal address validation service that can be applied across multiple payment methods, not just credit card transactions. The system provides a general-purpose address verification mechanism that works with various funding sources including loans, funded accounts, electronic fund transfers, and other alternative payment methods, thereby maintaining payment flexibility while improving verification reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple addresses are allowed for buyers, then buyer flexibility is improved, but fraud detection becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaddress flexibilityVSAvoidfraud detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation service that mediates between the buyer's multiple addresses and the merchant's fraud detection needs. The service acts as a trusted third party that verifies which addresses are legitimate for the buyer, providing merchants with confidence even when buyers have multiple valid addresses for different purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11380139B2Automatic address validation
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 PAYPAL INC
  • US11380139B2 patent drawing
  • US11380139B2 patent drawing
  • US11380139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An identifier is received with a portion of a postal address. That portion is compared against multiple additional postal addresses associated with the identifier. If a match is detected, a confirmation is transmitted to a requestor who originally sent the identifier and the portion of the postal address.