Pipe Splitter Blade Geometry for Utility-Safe HDPE Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pipe splitting methods face challenges in efficiently replacing large diameter HDPE gas pipes and other materials without damaging adjacent utilities, and in minimizing friction during new pipe insertion due to shape memory effects.

Innovation Solution

A splitter system with blades having a cutting depth less than the pipe's wall thickness to avoid adjacent utilities, combined with a shaping mandrel to form a predictable pipe configuration, and an expander to reduce friction by cutting the pipe into sections and using a non-conductive insert and lubricant dispenser to minimize damage and facilitate new pipe insertion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a cutting blade is pulled through the pipe to be replaced, then the pipe is split and a new pipe can be attached, but adjacent utilities may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe replacement efficiencyVSAvoiddamage to adjacent utilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting blade is designed to cut only a portion of the pipe wall thickness rather than completely through it. This partial cutting action allows the pipe to be split and expanded without completely severing it, thereby avoiding damage to adjacent utilities while still enabling new pipe insertion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions including positioning the cutting blade at a controlled depth, using an expander to gently separate the pipe walls, and applying lubricant before new pipe insertion. These preliminary steps prevent excessive force from being applied that could damage adjacent utilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Productivity

If the pipe is split and expanded to insert a new pipe, then pipe replacement is achieved, but friction increases due to shape memory effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe replacement efficiencyVSAvoidfriction during new pipe insertion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe is pre-split using cutting blades that create controlled incisions before expansion. This preliminary splitting action reduces the resistance encountered during subsequent expansion and new pipe insertion, thereby reducing friction caused by shape memory effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A lubricant is introduced as an intermediary substance between the new pipe and the split pipe walls. This lubricant reduces friction and allows the new pipe to be pulled through the expanded section with minimal resistance, overcoming shape memory effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If cutting blades are used to split the pipe, then pipe separation is achieved, but adjacent utilities may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepipe splitting capabilityVSAvoiddamage to adjacent utilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting blades are designed to cut only a portion of the pipe wall thickness rather than completely through it. This partial cutting achieves sufficient pipe separation for splitting while maintaining enough structural integrity to prevent damage to adjacent utilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting action is localized to specific angular positions around the pipe circumference rather than being applied uniformly. This localized cutting approach allows precise control over where and how deep the pipe is cut, avoiding damage to adjacent utilities while achieving effective pipe separation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables safe and efficient replacement of pipes with minimal impact on adjacent utilities and reduced friction, allowing for the successful insertion of new pipes while protecting fragile and dangerous utilities.

Implementation Method 1

lubricant dispenser to minimize damage and facilitate new pipe insertion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS11105456B2Device and method to split pipe near utilities
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 TT TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11105456B2 patent drawing
  • US11105456B2 patent drawing
  • US11105456B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A splitter system and methods are shown. In various examples, a splitter body has a plurality of blades attached at different angular locations around a perimeter of the splitter body, and the plurality of blades includes a primary blade having a primary cutting depth that is deeper than the rest of the plurality of blades. The plurality of blades splits pipe into multiple sections to relax shape memory of split pipe. In some examples, an expander is coupled behind the splitter body. The expander may include at least one opening to expel a fluid for lubrication when the splitter system is configured to introduce a fluid to the expander through a new pipe that is pulled behind the expander. Other configurations are further shown that provide lubrication to splitting operations in multiple locations along a splitter system, additional methods of lubrication, and electrical isolation of cutting blades.