Partial Oxidation Reactor Startup Using Controlled Hot Oxygen

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for starting up partial oxidation (POx) reactors involve slow heating to avoid damaging refractory linings, leading to disruptive gas flow changes and soot production, and require additional burners or shutdowns, disrupting the process.

Innovation Solution

A method using a coupled burner and reactor system with controlled feeding of primary and auxiliary fuels and oxygen to generate a stream of hot oxygen, gradually increasing temperature and pressure to heat the reactor, allowing for continuous operation without additional burners or shutdowns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional slow heating method is used to avoid damaging refractory linings, then refractory lining damage is prevented, but startup time is extended and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefractory lining integrityVSAvoidstartup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a preliminary heating phase using a separate warmup burner before the main POx burner is activated. This preliminary action heats the reactor vessel to a temperature that allows the main burner to start up without causing thermal shock or damaging the refractory lining, thereby enabling faster startup while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The heating process is segmented into two distinct phases: a warmup phase using a separate warmup burner, and a main operation phase using the POx burner. This segmentation allows the system to apply low-temperature heating initially to protect the refractory lining, then transition to high-temperature operation for productivity, resolving the contradiction between protection and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If a secondary warmup burner is added to enable faster heating, then startup speed is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating rateVSAvoidburner system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A separate warmup burner is installed to perform preliminary heating of the reactor vessel before the main POx burner is activated. This preliminary action enables faster heating during the startup phase without requiring the main burner to operate at full capacity from the beginning, thereby improving speed while managing complexity through a dedicated warmup function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between two heating modes: warmup mode using the separate warmup burner when the vessel temperature is below the ignition temperature of the POx burner, and main operation mode using the POx burner when the vessel reaches sufficient temperature. This dynamic operation optimizes heating speed while managing system complexity through conditional operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the primary POx burner is physically removed and replaced with a warmup burner, then warmup functionality is improved, but process continuity is disrupted due to shutdown requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarmup functionalityVSAvoidprocess continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The burner system is segmented into two functional units: a separate warmup burner for preliminary heating, and the original POx burner for main operation. This segmentation allows the warmup burner to be optimized for its specific function without interfering with the POx burner's ability to maintain continuous operation, thereby improving ease of operation while preserving productivity through independent operation of both burners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by keeping both the warmup burner and POx burner operational in their respective functions. The warmup burner operates during the startup phase to heat the vessel, while the POx burner operates continuously once the vessel reaches ignition temperature, eliminating the need to shut down the main burner for warmup operations and thus maintaining process continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If abrupt startup of POx burner is used to reduce startup time, then productivity is improved, but soot production increases and harmful factors worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestartup speedVSAvoidsoot production
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The separate warmup burner performs preliminary heating of the reactor vessel to a temperature that prepares the system for POx burner ignition. This preliminary action raises the vessel temperature without causing abrupt thermal changes, thereby enabling faster startup while preventing soot production that would occur with abrupt burner activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The warmup burner provides beforehand cushioning by gradually heating the reactor vessel before the main POx burner is activated. This cushioning effect prevents thermal shock and abrupt temperature changes that would cause soot formation, thereby enabling rapid startup while minimizing harmful factors through controlled thermal progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and continuous startup of POx reactors by maintaining controlled temperature and pressure increases, reducing soot production and minimizing process disruption.

Implementation Method 1

combusting in the burner the primary fuel and the oxygen in the gaseous oxidant to generate a product stream that emerges from the burner and contains combustion products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

passing the products of said combustion into the interior of the reactor to heat the interior of the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

combusting the auxiliary fuel between the burner and the reactor or within the reactor with all of the uncombusted oxygen in the product stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 4

passing the products of said combustion into the interior of the reactor to continue to increase the temperature of the interior of the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 5

Partial oxidation (POx) reactors typically operate at temperatures of 2400F or above. To start up operation of a POx reactor from a condition in which the temperature within the POx vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial oxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS12448288B2Startup methods for oxidation reactor
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 PRAXAIR TECH INC
  • US12448288B2 patent drawing
  • US12448288B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a reactor for partial oxidation of feedstock employing a hot oxygen stream that is generated by a suitable burner, the same burner that generates and provides the hot oxygen stream in full-scale partial oxidation operation can be employed in the starting-up of the partial oxidation reactor by suitable control of the characteristics of the feed to the burner, or of the pressures.