Particle Beam Focusing via Stage Current Extrema

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for focusing particle beams in scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) are subjective, difficult to automate, and rely on discernible edge features, which are not always present, making it challenging to achieve precise and automated focusing, especially in nanoprobe environments.

Innovation Solution

The method involves measuring absorbed or secondary current from a sample to determine the extrema of the current profile, allowing for iterative adjustment of working distance and stigmator controls to achieve a tight beam spot, independent of surface patterns and suitable for both electron and ion beams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional focusing techniques relying on image observation by trained operators are used, then focusing can be achieved when discernible edge features are present, but the process is subjective, difficult to automate, and not reproducible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated focusingVSAvoidfocusing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual visual inspection mechanism with an automated electrical measurement system. Instead of operators visually observing images to determine focus, the system uses automated measurement of absorbed or secondary current to objectively determine beam focus through extrema detection in current profiles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-adjustment by automatically measuring current extrema and using this information to determine optimal focus settings without requiring external operator intervention or subjective judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional focusing techniques relying on discernible edge features are used, then focusing can be performed with operator judgment, but the method fails when such features are not present on the sample surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to various samplesVSAvoidfocusing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the focusing determination criterion from dependence on sample surface features. Instead of relying on edge features present on the sample, the system uses electrical current measurements that are independent of sample morphology, making the method applicable to any sample type regardless of surface characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The current measurement-based focusing method serves as a universal approach that works across different sample types, materials, and beam energies without requiring adjustment for the presence or absence of specific surface features, unlike conventional image-based methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If iterative scanning of working distance and stigmator controls is performed to achieve tight beam spot, then focusing precision below 10 nm is achieved, but measurement time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam spot precisionVSAvoidfocusing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by measuring current at multiple working distance settings, identifying extrema in the current profile, and using this information to guide iterative adjustment of focus controls. The feedback loop continues until optimal focus is achieved, with each iteration informed by previous measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary scanning of the working distance range to identify the approximate location of current extrema before performing detailed iterative optimization. This preliminary action narrows the search space and reduces the time required for subsequent precision focusing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables reproducible and automated focusing with resolution below 10 nm, independent of surface features, and is applicable to a range of materials and beam energies, effectively addressing the limitations of conventional focusing techniques.

Implementation Method 1

measuring absorbed or secondary current from a sample receiving a particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron-hole pair creation: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11328895B2Particle beam focusing
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 FEI CO
  • US11328895B2 patent drawing
  • US11328895B2 patent drawing
  • US11328895B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods are disclosed for particle beam focusing, suitable for use in sample preparation or test environments, including SEM-based nanoprobing platforms. With a particle beam incident on a sample surface, stage current is used as an indicator of spot size. By scanning or searching settings of a working distance control, a control value having maximum (or minimum) stage current is used to set the beam waist at the sample surface. Alternatively, minima (or maxima) of reflected current can be used. Stigmator controls can be adjusted similarly to reduce astigmatism. The scan of control settings can be performed concurrently with sweeping the beam across a region of interest on the sample. Curved sweep patterns can be used. Energy measurements can be used as an alternative to current measurement. Applications to a nanoprobing workflow are disclosed.