Particle Beam Charge Compensation With Adaptive Gas Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for operating particle beam systems to mitigate local charging on samples require laborious manual adjustment of gas flow for charge compensation, which is time-consuming and inefficient, especially for inexperienced users, affecting image quality and resolution.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining the optimal gas flow for charge compensation in particle beam systems using a database to correlate operating parameters, allowing automatic determination based on stored entries and interpolation functions, reducing calculation complexity and improving image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gas flow to the sample surface is increased for charge compensation, then charge compensation improves, but resolution decreases due to particle scattering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge compensationVSAvoidresolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the gas flow rate based on real-time detection of charging artifacts and beam parameters. The gas flow is not static but continuously optimized during operation to maintain the optimal balance between charge compensation and resolution, allowing the system to adapt to different sample conditions and beam settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously including gas flow rate, beam current, and scanning speed in a coordinated manner. By adjusting these parameters together rather than independently, the system achieves charge compensation while minimizing the negative impact on resolution, as the combined parameter optimization creates a more favorable interaction between the gas atmosphere and particle beam.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If gas flow is increased to improve charge compensation, then brightness and contrast decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge compensationVSAvoidbrightness and contrast
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes gas flow rate during operation based on detected image quality metrics. When brightness or contrast degradation is detected, the system automatically reduces gas flow or adjusts beam parameters to restore optimal image quality, ensuring that charge compensation does not come at the cost of image brightness and contrast.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from image quality assessment to continuously optimize gas flow settings. By monitoring brightness and contrast in real-time and using this information to adjust gas flow rate, the system maintains optimal image quality while still achieving effective charge compensation, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents quality degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of gas flow is performed to optimize image quality, then image quality improves, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic optimization of gas flow settings without requiring user intervention. The control unit autonomously detects charging artifacts, assesses image quality, and adjusts gas flow rate accordingly, enabling the system to serve itself in the optimization process and eliminating the time-consuming manual trial-and-error procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical adjustment of gas flow with automated electronic control and software-based optimization algorithms. By substituting the manual mechanical adjustment process with an automated computational system that uses image analysis and parameter optimization algorithms, the system achieves rapid optimization without user involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If conventional manual optimization method is used, then ease of operation is reduced, but automation extent can be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidautomation extent
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously performs the complete optimization process including artifact detection, parameter assessment, and gas flow adjustment without user intervention. This self-service capability makes the system extremely easy to operate while maximizing automation, as users simply need to initiate the process and the system handles all optimization decisions automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual operational procedures with automated software-based control and optimization algorithms. By substituting manual judgment and adjustment with computational image analysis and automated parameter optimization, the system achieves high ease of operation while implementing extensive automation throughout the optimization workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates efficient and accurate setting of gas flow for charge compensation, enhancing image quality and resolution while minimizing user intervention and calculation complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a gas (usually nitrogen) can be guided directly to the sample surface via a nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow:

Implementation Method 2

the conductivity of the surroundings can increase and can lead to the more rapid discharge of the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge compensation: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

a focused electron beam is scanned over a sample to be examined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam focusing: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 4

secondary electrons or backscattered electrons, generated by the incident electron beam at the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSecondary electron generation: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 5

the scattering of the particles at the gas can be kept low and accordingly the resolution of particle-microscopic images decreases only slightly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS12537162B2Method of operating a particle beam system and related system and computer program product
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
  • US12537162B2 patent drawing
  • US12537162B2 patent drawing
  • US12537162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a particle beam system comprises determining values of operating parameters of the particle beam system, and operating the particle beam system with the determined values of the operating parameters, and also recording a particle-microscopic image of a sample via the particle beam system. The operating parameters can represent at least a magnitude of a flow of a gas fed to the sample for charge compensation, a current of a particle beam directed at the sample for recording the image, a kinetic energy of the particles of the particle beam upon impinging on the sample, a scanning speed of the particle beam over the sample for recording the image, and a magnification of the recorded image.