Particle-Based Hazard Detection for Autonomous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous driving systems face challenges in accurately detecting and classifying hazards in three-dimensional space due to limitations in depth estimation and sparse data sampling from sensors like LiDAR.

Innovation Solution

The system employs particle-based hazard detection by fusing outputs from multiple sensors over time to determine the probability of a stationary object or hazard existing at a location. This involves generating particles with confidence values based on sensor data, adjusting weights based on depth sensor data, and continuously resampling the environment to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If monocular camera detection systems are used to estimate hazard position and size, then classification capability is improved, but depth estimation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification capabilityVSAvoiddepth estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor types (monocular cameras, LiDAR, and depth sensors) into a unified detection system. The monocular camera provides classification information while LiDAR and depth sensors provide accurate depth measurements. By merging these sensor outputs through sensor fusion algorithms, the system achieves both accurate classification and precise depth estimation that neither sensor type could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If LiDAR systems are used to provide depth estimates, then depth measurement capability is improved, but sample density for small objects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth measurement capabilityVSAvoidsample density
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using the monocular camera to provide high-density 2D image data that complements the LiDAR's sparse 3D point cloud. The camera captures detailed visual information for small objects at locations where LiDAR samples are sparse, while LiDAR provides accurate depth where available. This local complementarity ensures both small and large objects are detected with appropriate detail levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If LiDAR systems output 3D point clouds, then depth information is improved, but hazard classification capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth informationVSAvoidhazard classification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the monocular camera as an intermediary that bridges the gap between LiDAR's depth information and classification needs. The camera captures 2D images that contain rich visual features for classification (color, texture, shape patterns). By fusing these 2D image features with 3D point cloud data, the system achieves both accurate depth measurement and reliable hazard classification that LiDAR alone cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are fused over time, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sensor fusion process into distinct functional modules: a monocular camera module for classification, a LiDAR module for depth measurement, and a depth sensor module for supplementary range information. Each sensor type processes data independently according to its strengths, and their outputs are combined through a fusion algorithm. This modular segmentation reduces overall system complexity compared to a monolithic approach while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250180736A1Multimodal object detection for autonomous systems and applications
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250180736A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180736A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180736A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various examples, a hazard detection system fuses outputs from multiple sensors over time to determine a probability that a stationary object or hazard exists at a location. The system may then use sensor data to calculate a detection bounding shape for detected objects and, using the bounding shape, may generate a set of particles, each including a confidence value that an object exists at a corresponding location. The system may then capture additional sensor data by one or more sensors of the ego-machine that are different from those used to capture the first sensor data. To improve the accuracy of the confidences of the particles, the system may determine a correspondence between the first sensor data and the additional sensor data (e.g., depth sensor data), which may be used to filter out a portion of the particles and improve the depth predictions corresponding to the object.