Particle Risk Assessment Using Adaptive Pulse Train Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for determining the risk level of particles during transport fail to accurately assess the risk due to their reliance on signal strength from heat-generated radiation, which does not account for varying ignition temperatures and energies of different particle types and their properties, leading to false alarms or missed warnings.

Innovation Solution

A sensor arrangement with multiple sensing elements and a processing device that forms pulse trains from detected signals to determine risk levels, adapting parameters based on particle properties such as type, size, temperature, energy content, moisture, and movement speed, allowing for precise risk assessment by setting tailored thresholds and filtering out non-relevant signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single threshold is used for risk determination based on signal strength, then the system is simple to operate, but measurement precision deteriorates because different particle types have different ignition temperatures and energies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of risk determinationVSAvoidaccuracy of risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the threshold parameter based on detected particle properties. Instead of using a fixed threshold, the processing device adapts the threshold according to the specific particle type, size, and temperature characteristics detected, thereby achieving both operational simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The threshold is made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously adjusts the risk determination threshold based on real-time particle property detection, allowing the same system to handle diverse particle types accurately while maintaining ease of operation through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system adapts parameters based on multiple particle properties, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to multiple sensing elements and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk level determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of sensor arrangement and processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor arrangement and processing device are designed to handle multiple particle properties and types through a unified system. The same sensing elements and processing logic adapt to detect various particle characteristics (size, temperature, type) and adjust thresholds accordingly, reducing the need for separate specialized systems for each particle type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the risk determination process into distinct detectable particle properties (size, temperature, type) that can be measured separately and then integrated. This modular approach allows precise measurement of each property while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Temperature

If the system uses signal strength from heat-generated radiation, then it can detect particle temperature, but reliability deteriorates because it cannot distinguish between different particle types with different ignition characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle temperature detectionVSAvoidaccuracy of risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that correlates temperature detection with particle property identification. Instead of directly converting temperature to risk level, the processing device uses the temperature signal along with other particle characteristics to determine the appropriate threshold, thereby improving reliability by considering ignition characteristics specific to each particle type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces a simple temperature-threshold comparison mechanism with a more sophisticated processing approach that substitutes direct mechanical/physical threshold checking with adaptive computational threshold adjustment based on particle property analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate and specific risk level determination for particles, reducing false alarms and ensuring timely intervention by accounting for the unique properties of different particle types, thereby enhancing safety in particle transport systems.

Implementation Method 1

detect a signal related to the temperature of particles moving through said field-of-view

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS11976978B2Determination of risk level for particles
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 FIREFLY AB
  • US11976978B2 patent drawing
  • US11976978B2 patent drawing
  • US11976978B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for determining a risk level for particles moving along a path. —The system includes a sensor arrangement including at least one set of sensing elements including at least two sensing elements arranged to co-operate with mutually separated sensing zones along the path of movement of the particles to detect a signal related to temperature of the particles. The system further includes a processing device arranged to: receive signals from the sensor arrangement; form signals from the sensing elements into a pulse train when a particle moves through field-of-view of the sensor arrangement; based on the pulse train, determine a risk level for the particles; and adapt at least one parameter used in the determination of the risk level based on at least one property of the particles moving along the path of movement from the first position to the second position.