Ultrafine Particle Sensor Transient Measurement Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ultrafine particle sensors struggle to accurately determine the size distribution of airborne particles in transient environments, leading to inaccuracies in particle number concentration and average diameter measurements due to rapid changes in air pollution characteristics, which limits their reliability and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A device that characterizes the evolution of electrically-charged airborne particles over time by using a particle charging unit, concentration variation section, and data evaluation unit to infer particle number concentration and average diameter, with restrictions on the allowed change of the inferred average particle diameter relative to a reference diameter, ensuring internal consistency and physical realism of measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional UFP sensors measure particle concentration and size distribution in transient environments, then measurement speed is maintained, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to rapid changes in air pollution characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement speedVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by continuously adjusting the measurement strategy based on the detected rate of change in particle concentration. The system transitions between different measurement modes (continuous vs. periodic) and adapts averaging windows dynamically, allowing it to maintain both speed and accuracy across varying environmental conditions without requiring hardware modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (measurement frequency, averaging time, threshold values) based on the transient characteristics of the environment. By monitoring the rate of change and adjusting parameters accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between measurement speed and accuracy for different pollution scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If data averaging procedures are implemented to improve measurement accuracy, then measurement accuracy improves, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic averaging where the averaging window size is not fixed but adapts based on environmental conditions. During stable periods, longer averaging is applied for accuracy; during transient periods, averaging is reduced or suspended to maintain fast response. This dynamic approach eliminates the trade-off by making the averaging duration context-dependent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies averaging selectively rather than continuously. Instead of always applying full averaging (excessive action), it applies partial averaging only when conditions warrant it, thereby reducing the time loss while maintaining accuracy benefits when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If hardware adaptations are made to improve measurement reliability in transient environments, then measurement reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where measurement data is continuously analyzed to detect transient conditions, and this information feeds back into the control logic to adjust measurement parameters. This software-based feedback loop achieves reliability improvement without adding hardware complexity, as the adaptation is performed through intelligent data processing rather than additional sensors or components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces potential hardware adaptations (such as multiple physical sensors or mechanical switching mechanisms) with software-based adaptive algorithms. The complexity is shifted from the mechanical/hardware domain to the software/domain logic, achieving the same reliability improvement without increasing physical device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of time

If continuous measurement is performed to capture transient changes, then response time improves, but data scatter increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoiddata scatter
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic measurement strategies that adjust the measurement frequency and data processing based on detected transient conditions. During periods of rapid change, the system performs continuous measurements with reduced processing to capture events quickly, then applies selective filtering afterward. During stable periods, it uses longer averaging. This dynamic approach reduces data scatter while maintaining fast response to transient events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces scatter in inferred data for particle number concentration and average diameter, improving accuracy under both stationary and transient conditions without requiring hardware adaptations or averaging procedures, allowing for more reliable and consistent measurements.

Implementation Method 1

In case particle charging in the charging section 18 is accomplished by diffusion charging, I s is proportional to the particle length concentration L = N*d p,av

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion charging: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

In case a non-zero electric field is applied between the plates across the conduit, at least part of the airborne electrically-charged particles entering the plate section will be electrostatically precipitated onto one of the electrode surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic precipitation: Electrostatic Deposition

Implementation Method 3

the UFP sensor 10 comprises a particle sensing section 13 comprising a Faraday cage arrangement 16, which is electrically insulated from the remainder of the UFP sensor 10

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFaraday cage effect: Faraday Cage

Data Source

PatentEP2350609B1Device for characterizing the evolution over time of a size distribution of electrically-charged airborne particles in an airflow
Publication Date: 2018.06.06 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP2350609B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2350609B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2350609B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device is presented that is capable of recording the evolution over time of the characteristics of a size distribution of electrically-charged airborne particles in an airflow. The device comprises an air inlet, a particle charging unit, a concentration variation section, a particle sensing section and a data evaluation unit. Specifically, the particle sensing section of the device generates at least two serially obtained measurement signals I1 and I2 from which the data evaluation unit can infer values for both the average particle diameter dp,av and the number concentration N of the size distribution of electrically-charged airborne particles. Reliable values can be obtained for N and dp,av under both stationary conditions and transient conditions with respect to the characteristics of the particle size distribution due to the condition that the change of the inferred average particle diameter dp,av with respect to a reference particle diameter dp,ref is bounded by a set maximum change. This imposed condition markedly reduces scatter in the inferred values for dp,av and N as a function of time, while still allowing transient characteristics with respect to both N and dp,av to become visible in the course of time, without having to rely on averaging procedures and/or device hardware adaptations.