Particle Separator Support via Downcomer Pipes in Fluidized Bed Boilers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bottom-supported fluidized bed boilers face challenges in supporting the particle separator, requiring strong common walls and additional support legs due to uneven thermal expansion and weight distribution, which complicates installation and increases structural demands.

Innovation Solution

A frame-like supporting member is used to surround the conical lower portion of the particle separator, with outboard portions attached to downcomer pipes and inboard portions attached to the furnace side wall, providing a stable and simplified support system that distributes the weight effectively without needing a common wall or special support legs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a common wall construction is used to support the particle separator, then the structural strength is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is segmented into separate components: the particle separator, the frame-like supporting member, and the downcomer pipes. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured and installed independently, reducing complexity while maintaining structural strength through proper connection design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A frame-like supporting member is introduced as an intermediary element between the particle separator and the downcomer pipes. This intermediary structure distributes the weight of the particle separator to multiple downcomer pipes, providing adequate support without requiring a complex common wall construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If special support legs are added to support the particle separator, then the stability is improved, but the device complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The downcomer pipes serve multiple functions: they are both part of the fluid circulation system and provide structural support for the particle separator through the frame-like supporting member. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate support legs, reducing device complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If the common wall is made stronger to carry the weight, then the strength is improved, but the ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The support function is segmented from the common wall and assigned to separate downcomer pipes connected through a frame-like supporting member. This allows the common wall to be manufactured with standard strength requirements, improving ease of manufacture while the overall structural strength is maintained through the distributed support system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If a bottom-supported construction is used, then the ease of operation is improved, but the structural demands on walls increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The frame-like supporting member acts as an intermediary that distributes the structural load from the particle separator to multiple downcomer pipes. This intermediary structure reduces the structural demands on individual walls and the common wall, making the bottom-supported construction feasible while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9964301B2Fluidized bed boiler with a support construction for a particle separator
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 SUMITOMO SHI FW ENERGIA OY
  • US9964301B2 patent drawing
  • US9964301B2 patent drawing
  • US9964301B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluidized bed boiler with a support construction for a particle separator. The fluidized bed boiler includes a bottom-supported furnace in which at least one particle separator with a support construction is in gas flow connection with an upper portion of the furnace and includes a furnace side portion, an outer portion opposite to the furnace side portion, and a conical lower portion. At least two bottom-supported downcomer pipes are in fluid connection with a steam drum and adjacent to the outer portion of the particle separator. The support construction includes a frame-like supporting member surrounding at least a portion of the conical lower portion, and an outboard portion of the supporting member is attached to the at least two downcomer pipes to support the at last one particle separator.