Particle Arrangement on Substrate via Physical Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for arranging particles on substrates face challenges such as low surface coverage, coexistence of different array types, inability to form certain lattice structures, non-uniform layer thickness, poor continuity in 3D arrays, and require precise control of temperature and humidity, especially when using solvents which can lead to cracking due to particle shrinkage.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a substrate with depressions or projections that allows particles to be inserted through physical pressure, such as rubbing, eliminating the need for solvent-based self-assembly and enabling the formation of large-scale, defect-free, and uniform 1D and 2D arrays with higher tolerance for particle size and shape.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional solvent-based self-assembly methods are used to arrange particles on substrates, then particles can be organized into arrays, but the surface coverage is low (75% or less) and defect-free large-scale monocrystalline arrays cannot be formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle array qualityVSAvoidsurface coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the solvent from the particle arrangement process. By using a dry, solvent-free mechanical pressing method, the patent removes the harmful medium that causes particle shrinkage and cracking, enabling complete surface coverage and defect-free arrays without the limitations of conventional solvent-based self-assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical/self-assembly mechanism with a mechanical pressing system. A press applies controlled mechanical force to arrange particles directly onto the substrate, substituting the spontaneous solvent-driven self-assembly process with a deterministic mechanical arrangement that achieves 100% coverage and perfect lattice structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If solvent-based self-assembly methods are used, then particles can form arrays, but cracking occurs due to particle shrinkage after solvent evaporation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray structure integrityVSAvoidcracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the solvent from the particle arrangement process. By using a dry, solvent-free mechanical pressing method, the patent removes the harmful medium that causes particle shrinkage and cracking, enabling complete surface coverage and defect-free arrays without the limitations of conventional solvent-based self-assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potential harm of mechanical pressure into a benefit. By applying controlled mechanical pressing, the patent directly arranges particles into perfect lattices without the intermediate step of solvent evaporation that causes cracking, turning mechanical force from a potential damage source into the primary arrangement mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional methods are used to arrange particles, then some array structures can be formed, but certain lattice structures (e.g., tetragonal close-packed fcc (100)) cannot be formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelattice structure varietyVSAvoidlattice structure control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameters of the arrangement process by eliminating solvent and using mechanical pressing. This parameter change enables the formation of diverse lattice structures including tetragonal close-packed fcc (100) arrays, which cannot be achieved through conventional solvent-based self-assembly, providing both versatility and precise control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If solvent-based self-assembly is used, then particles can be arranged, but precise control of temperature and humidity is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray formation controlVSAvoidenvironmental control requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the solvent from the particle arrangement process. By using a dry, solvent-free mechanical pressing method, the patent removes the harmful medium that causes particle shrinkage and cracking, enabling complete surface coverage and defect-free arrays without the limitations of conventional solvent-based self-assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical/self-assembly mechanism with a mechanical pressing system. A press applies controlled mechanical force to arrange particles directly onto the substrate, substituting the spontaneous solvent-driven self-assembly process with a deterministic mechanical arrangement that achieves 100% coverage and perfect lattice structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for rapid and precise arrangement of particles on a large scale with improved reproducibility, avoiding the limitations of solvent-based methods by ensuring 100% particle coverage and perfect lattice formation without cracking, and is not affected by surface characteristics like hydrophobicity or charge.

Implementation Method 1

applying a physical pressure to the particles so that a portion or the whole of each particle is inserted in each of pores defined by the depressions or the projections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS9994442B2Method for arranging fine particles on substrate by physical pressure
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 IND UNIV COOP FOUND SOGANG UNIV
  • US9994442B2 patent drawing
  • US9994442B2 patent drawing
  • US9994442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method of arranging particles on a substrate, the method including: (a) preparing a substrate, a surface of which has depressions or projections capable of fixing the positions and/or orientations of one or more particles; and (b) placing the particles on the substrate and applying a physical pressure to the particles so that a portion or the whole of each particle is inserted in each of pores defined by the depressions or the projections. Provided is also a method of arranging particles on a substrate, the method including: (a) preparing a substrate, at least a surface portion of which has adhesive property; and (b) placing particles, which do not have flat facets but curved surfaces, on the substrate and applying a physical pressure to the particles so that the particles are immobilized on adhesive surface portions of the substrate.