Particulate Bed Pressure Drop in Flue Gas Streams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flue gas processing systems in catalyst regenerators face issues such as erosion of orifice chamber grid holes due to particulate content, leading to pressure drop degradation, noise, vibration, and plugging, especially in larger units and resid FCC processes, which necessitates frequent maintenance and reduces the lifespan of equipment.

Innovation Solution

The use of a bed of particulates, such as inert ceramic materials like alumina and silica, to impose a pressure drop on the flue gas stream, which can be replenished when deposits accumulate, and a pressure reduction vessel design that balances pressure drop changes by adjusting particulate inventory, avoiding erosion and plugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If orifice chambers use grids with holes to impose a pressure drop on the flue gas, then pressure reduction is achieved, but the grid holes suffer from erosion, plugging, and require frequent maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflue gas pressureVSAvoidequipment lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the durable but erosion-prone grid structure with a disposable particulate bed (ceramic balls, rings, or irregular shapes). These particulates are inexpensive and can be easily replaced when depleted, eliminating the need for maintenance of complex grid structures. The particulates impose the required pressure drop without suffering from erosion or plugging issues that affect traditional grids.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a bed of particulate materials with inherent porosity and void spaces between particles to create the pressure drop. This porous structure allows flue gas to flow through while the particles themselves resist erosion and plugging. The particulate bed maintains its structural integrity better than solid grids with holes, directly addressing the reliability issues mentioned in the contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Stress or pressure

If the pressure drop is imposed by grids with holes, then pressure reduction is achieved, but noise and vibration problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflue gas pressureVSAvoidnoise and vibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The particulate bed creates a distributed porous structure that gradually impedes gas flow, reducing the sudden turbulence and vortex formation that occur with grid holes. This gradual pressure drop mechanism significantly reduces noise and vibration levels compared to the abrupt restriction created by perforated grids.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The use of simple particulate shapes (balls, rings, irregular forms) instead of complex grid structures eliminates the mechanical sources of vibration and noise associated with grid holes. The particulates create a more uniform flow distribution that reduces harmful acoustic and vibrational effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If particulates are used to impose pressure drop, then erosion and plugging are avoided, but deposits accumulate on particulates requiring replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment lifespanVSAvoidparticulate inventory
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent accepts that particulates will accumulate deposits over time and establishes a replacement strategy. The particulates are designed to be easily removable and replaceable, with the understanding that they will be discarded after a certain service life and replaced with fresh particulates. This approach trades the temporary loss of particulate inventory for long-term reliability and avoids the need for complex cleaning or maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces flue gas pressure, maintains equipment integrity, and balances pressure drop across the system, reducing maintenance needs and extending the lifespan of critical components.

Implementation Method 1

passing a pressurized flue gas stream from a catalyst regenerator to a pressure reduction vessel and through a bed of particulates in the pressure reduction vessel to reduce the pressure of the flue gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

The bed of particulates is disposed in the vessel between the outlet end of the inlet conduit and the inlet end of the outlet conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistance to gas flow: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10413891B1Process and apparatus for reducing pressure in a flue gas stream
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 UOP LLC
  • US10413891B1 patent drawing
  • US10413891B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process and apparatus for reducing pressure of a flue gas stream comprising passing a pressurized flue gas stream to a vessel and through a bed of particulates in the vessel to reduce the pressure of the flue gas stream. The flue gas passes from the vessel at a lower pressure than at which it entered. The bed of particulates is disposed in the vessel between the outlet end of the inlet conduit and the inlet end of the outlet conduit. If deposits develop in the bed of particulates, the particulates can be replaced with fresh particulates to avoid excessive pressure drop.