Parting Blade Insert Seat Layout for Long-Overhang Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing parting blades and tool holders face challenges in maintaining stability and chip evacuation during long overhang and high feed rate applications, particularly in machining operations with large depths of cut, due to bending and vibrations, and inefficiencies in coolant distribution and insert seat design.

Innovation Solution

The development of an elongated parting blade with an insert seat configuration featuring non-parallel lower and rear seat abutment surfaces, oblique blade orientation, and a tool holder design with a reinforcement portion to enhance structural strength and coolant distribution, allowing for improved chip evacuation and stability at high feed rates and large depths of cut.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If the parting blade is made longer for large depth of cut applications, then the depth of cut capability is improved, but bending and vibrations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade lengthVSAvoidblade stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The insert seat is positioned asymmetrically closer to one longitudinal edge of the blade, creating an optimized leverage arrangement that reduces bending moments and vibrations while maintaining long blade length for large depth of cut capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting insert is oriented with its rake surface perpendicular to the blade elongation direction, changing the dimensional relationship between cutting forces and blade structure to improve stability in long overhang applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the insert seat is configured with non-parallel abutment surfaces, then cutting force distribution is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting force distributionVSAvoidinsert seat manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The insert seat incorporates non-parallel lower and rear abutment surfaces that asymmetrically distribute cutting forces, improving blade stability and reducing vibrations during high feed rate operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Specific regions of the insert seat are given different geometric properties (non-parallel surfaces at critical force-bearing locations) to optimize cutting force distribution while keeping other areas simpler for manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If coolant outlets are positioned closer to the cutting insert, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but chip evacuation becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert coolingVSAvoidchip evacuation
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Coolant outlets are positioned above the rake surface of the cutting insert rather than below it, changing the spatial dimension of coolant delivery to simultaneously achieve effective cooling and maintain clear chip evacuation pathways

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Coolant delivery is localized to specific areas above the rake surface where heat generation is most intense, providing targeted cooling without interfering with chip flow paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Volume of moving object

If the blade thickness is reduced for compact tool holder configuration, then tool holder compactness is improved, but blade strength decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade volumeVSAvoidblade strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is constructed from high-performance composite materials that provide exceptional strength-to-weight ratio, enabling reduced blade thickness and compact tool holder configuration while maintaining adequate strength for large depth of cut applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The blade incorporates optimized material distribution and geometric features at critical locations to maintain strength despite overall thickness reduction, allowing compact tool holder design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12145202B2Parting blade and tool holder therefor
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 ISCAR LTD
  • US12145202B2 patent drawing
  • US12145202B2 patent drawing
  • US12145202B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool holder includes a tool shank and a tool head connected to the tool shank. The tool head has a rear surface. An insert seat or a blade pocket is partially formed on both the tool head and the tool shank, and extends rearwardly of the tool head's rear surface. Adjacent to at least a portion of a shank side surface there is a reinforcement portion connecting the shank side surface and the tool head.