Parylene Membrane Filters for Circulating Tumor Cell Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current filtration technologies are inadequate for efficiently capturing circulating tumor cells from blood due to low recovery rates and lengthy processing times, especially when dealing with low concentrations of cells in large blood volumes, as they often have randomly distributed holes that result in large openings and fused defects.

Innovation Solution

The development of parylene membrane filters with precisely controlled geometric designs, including size, shape, and density of holes, which allow for high-efficiency capture of circulating tumor cells while allowing red blood cells to pass through, using a substrate comprising parylene polymer deposited through a highly-conformal vapor deposition process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If commercially available polycarbonate filters are used for mechanical filtration of blood, then large sample volumes can be processed, but the recovery rate is low due to randomly distributed holes with large openings and fused defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample volume processing capabilityVSAvoidcell recovery rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical punching method used to create filter holes with a laser-based fabrication method. This substitution eliminates the random distribution and fused defects characteristic of mechanically punched holes, producing precise, uniformly distributed holes with controlled dimensions that maintain structural integrity while enabling effective cell filtration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the hole size parameter from the large, uncontrolled openings in commercial filters to precisely controlled smaller holes (e.g., 5-15 micrometers in diameter). This parameter change ensures that holes are small enough to capture circulating tumor cells effectively while maintaining uniform distribution and avoiding fused defects, thereby improving recovery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If existing filtration methods are used to capture circulating tumor cells, then filtration can be performed, but the processing time is extended to hours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell capture capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical filtration systems with a laser-fabricated membrane filter system. This substitution enables faster processing by creating a more efficient filtration structure with precise hole distribution and optimal size, reducing the time required to process blood samples from hours to minutes while maintaining high capture capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If membrane filters with larger hole openings are used, then processing speed increases, but the capture efficiency of small tumor cells decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration speedVSAvoidtumor cell capture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the hole size parameter to a specific range (5-15 micrometers in diameter) that balances filtration speed and capture efficiency. This parameter optimization ensures holes are small enough to effectively capture small circulating tumor cells while maintaining sufficient open area for adequate fluid flow and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements uniform distribution of holes across the membrane surface, ensuring consistent local quality throughout the filter. This uniform distribution prevents localized clogging and maintains steady flow rates, achieving both high capture efficiency and sustained filtration speed throughout the processing period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The parylene membrane filters achieve greater than 80% recovery with high enrichment factors, processing samples in less than 10 minutes, outperforming existing methods by providing a cost-effective and reliable means for CTC monitoring with minimal human intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a substrate comprising parylene polymer deposited through a highly-conformal vapor deposition process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

A mechanical filter can be used to remove, filter, collect, concentrate and analyze particles and cells in a variety of fluid medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP1888238B1Parylene membrane filters
Publication Date: 2014.08.13 CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH
  • EP1888238B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP1888238B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1888238B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention provides parylene membrane filters (110), filter devices and methods of making them and using them in the mechanical separation of cells and particles by size. The provision of parylene membrane filters with high figures of merit and finely controlled hole sizes (125, 135) allows the separation of cells and particles in a variety of biological and other fluids according to size.