Passcode Restoration via Recovery Key and Active Token Authentication
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current authentication systems in electronic commerce and computer networks lack robustness in ensuring the authenticity of both users and service providers, leading to potential misrepresentation and data security breaches.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method that authenticates recovery keys and active tokens using a look-up table indexed by token identifiers, enabling secure transactions by requiring both parties to authenticate with unique tokens and passcodes, and employs encryption and dispersion techniques to secure data storage.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If authentication systems use traditional single-token methods, then the system is simpler to operate, but the security and reliability are insufficient against misrepresentation and data breaches
Solution Approach 1:
The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent components: active tokens for transaction authentication, recovery keys for account recovery, and a look-up table for verification. This segmentation allows each component to have a specific security function, improving overall reliability without requiring the entire system to become uniformly complex.
Solution Approach 2:
The look-up table acts as an intermediary between tokens and the authentication service. It stores and verifies token identifiers, enabling the system to validate multiple token types through a unified verification mechanism. This intermediary simplifies the complexity by providing a centralized verification point rather than requiring complex point-to-point validation logic.
2Reliability
If the system requires both recovery key and active token for authentication, then the reliability and authorization control are improved, but the ease of operation decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically adjusts authentication requirements based on the operation being performed. For normal transactions, only the active token is required. For recovery operations, both the recovery key and active token are required. This dynamic approach maintains high authorization control for critical operations while preserving ease of operation for routine tasks.
Solution Approach 2:
Different authentication strength requirements are applied to different operational contexts. Routine transactions use simpler authentication (active token only), while sensitive recovery operations use stronger authentication (both recovery key and active token). This local differentiation of authentication quality improves ease of operation for common tasks while maintaining reliability for critical functions.
3Reliability
If the system implements dispersion techniques for data storage, then the security against data breaches is improved, but the device complexity and storage requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
Sensitive authentication data is segmented into multiple dispersed storage locations rather than being stored in a single centralized database. The look-up table stores only token identifiers and verification data, while actual authentication credentials remain distributed. This segmentation improves data security by eliminating single points of failure while the modular structure keeps system complexity manageable.
Data Source
AI summary
A system method that includes providing a passcode to a user based on presentation of both a recovery key and an active token is described herein.