Passenger List Data Sharing for Automated Cross-Border Baggage Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing baggage handling systems for travel carriers are inefficient, costly, and resource-intensive, particularly in high-volume settings like cruise ships, due to the need for manual data entry and printing of bag tags, which can lead to errors and resource constraints, and luggage processing is cumbersome across international borders, causing delays and additional screening requirements.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes networked scanning devices to obtain baggage data, including IATA license plates, and converts it into structured SSI file sharing data for security screening, enabling real-time processing and communication across different security authorities, allowing for automated luggage screening and border control without manual data entry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual data entry and printing of bag tags is used, then baggage handling can be performed, but human resource consumption increases and errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of baggage handlingVSAvoidcomplexity of baggage handling system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing baggage to be automatically identified and processed through scanning devices that read IATA license plates and retrieve security screening images without human intervention. The automated retrieval and transmission of SSI data eliminates the need for manual data entry while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (handwriting baggage data, physical printing of bag tags) with electronic automated systems. Scanning devices optically capture IATA license plate information, and software automatically retrieves and transmits SSI data through communication networks, substituting human labor with automated electronic processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated security screening is implemented across international borders, then processing speed increases, but data transmission and coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity screening processing speedVSAvoidcomplexity of international coordination system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by creating a standardized SSI data format that can be used across different countries and security authorities. The standardized message format allows the same system to function in multiple international contexts, enabling seamless cross-border baggage screening without requiring country-specific customizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary standardized data format that mediates between different national security systems. The SSI message format acts as a universal language that facilitates communication between originating and destination security authorities, simplifying international coordination while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If manual baggage data entry is performed, then system simplicity is maintained, but error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of baggage dataVSAvoidlevel of automated data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by creating an electronic replica of the IATA license plate data through optical scanning. Instead of manual transcription, the scanning device captures an exact digital copy of the baggage identification information, which is then automatically processed and transmitted, eliminating human errors while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of time

If real-time SSI data transmission is implemented, then border clearance efficiency improves, but network infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for border clearanceVSAvoidcomplexity of network infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential SSI data elements needed for border clearance and transmits them in a standardized message format. By taking out only the necessary information (baggage identification, security screening results, routing data) rather than transmitting complete baggage records, the system reduces network requirements while achieving real-time clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12525066B2System and method for de-personalized security data file sharing using passenger list messages
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 MATEER CRAIG
  • US12525066B2 patent drawing
  • US12525066B2 patent drawing
  • US12525066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system and method for de-personalized security data file sharing using passenger list information messages, the method including: obtaining from an electronic passenger list information message, passenger data for passengers, the passenger data including a unique passenger identifier (UPID) assigned by a Departure Control System (DCS) of an originating airline for each of the plurality of passengers; and, for each of the passengers: depersonalizing the passenger data; retrieving a security screening image (SSI) representative of contents of the luggage item; converting the SSI and the UPID into SSI file sharing data for a security screening tool; transmitting the SSI file sharing data to a secure system associated with a border crossing airport to be used in a security screening process on the checked-in luggage item using the security screening tool; receiving a first screening message with a result of the screening process; and causing the result to be displayed, wherein the result includes one of: a first result representative of cleared security screening; or a second result representative of failed security screening, wherein one or more of the passenger or the checked-in luggage item that failed the security screening are flagged for further security inspection.