Passive Door Lock Mechanical Release Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional passive wing locks with integrated electric door openers face design limitations due to the need for a mechanical unlocking device to engage with the armature of the electric locking device, restricting arrangement and design options.

Innovation Solution

The mechanical unlocking device interacts with the electrically switchable actuator, shifting it out of the locking element's reach, allowing the door opener latch to be mechanically switched to a release position, with options including a movably mounted unlocking slide or lever, and the door opener latch designed as a swivel or linear sliding latch, interacting with upper or lower locking bar connection devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the mechanical release mechanism engages with the armature of the electric locking device, then mechanical unlocking is achieved, but design freedom and arrangement options are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical unlocking functionVSAvoiddesign freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a mechanical release mechanism that acts as an intermediary between the locking rod connection device and the door opener latch. This release mechanism includes a release lever or release slide that can be actuated by the locking rod connection device to mechanically switch the door opener latch into the release position, without requiring direct engagement with the electric locking device's armature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the unlocking function into separate components: the mechanical release mechanism (release lever/slide) and the door opener latch are designed as independent elements that interact through a defined interface. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and arranged with greater flexibility within the lock case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If the door opener unit is installed in a separate recess in the lock mechanism, then the electric door opener is integrated, but the arrangement options are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of door openerVSAvoidarrangement options
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical release mechanism is designed with universal applicability, where the release lever or release slide can be actuated by either the upper locking rod connection device or the lower locking rod connection device. This multi-functionality allows the same release mechanism design to work with different locking rod configurations, enhancing arrangement flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the mechanical release mechanism is designed to engage the armature directly, then unlocking is achieved, but the mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunlocking functionVSAvoidmechanism arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of having the mechanical release mechanism engage with the electric locking device's armature (traditional approach), the patent inverts the approach by having the mechanical release mechanism interact with the door opener latch directly. The locking rod connection device actuates the release mechanism, which then disengages the door opener latch from the latch bolt, achieving unlocking through this inverted mechanical pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration provides greater design freedom and functional reliability by allowing the door opener latch to be released mechanically or electrically, with the gear element disengaging from the latch in the release position, enhancing the locking mechanism's operational flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

The electric actuator can be designed as an electric coil, and the output-side locking element as an armature, e.g., a pivoting armature.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentEP2963215B1Passive leaf lock
Publication Date: 2021.05.05 ASSA ABLOY SICHERHEITSTECHNIK GMBH
  • EP2963215B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2963215B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2963215B1 patent drawingFigure 3s~4s

AI summary

A passive door lock is described, comprising a lock case containing the lock mechanism and door opener. A mechanical release (54) is provided, which interacts via an intermediate element (55) with the transmission slide (53) located between the door opener latch (51) and the output-side armature (52a) of the electric locking device (52). The mechanical release acts on the intermediate element (55) to mechanically release the electric door opener, and not on the armature (52a) of the locking device (52).