Passive ESD Protection Circuit with Trigger Voltage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ESD protection circuits in integrated circuits often occupy valuable space, increase component count, and decrease reliability due to active shut-off circuitry, which can lead to false triggering and leakage paths, complicating design and testing while requiring additional protection against ESD events.

Innovation Solution

A passive trigger voltage controlled ESD protection circuit using a resistor, capacitor, and blocking diode to selectively conduct current during ESD events, preventing false triggering and reducing leakage by maintaining a high impedance during normal operation and increasing the trigger voltage only during ESD events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active shut-off circuitry is used to disable ESD protection during normal operation, then false triggering is reduced, but device complexity and component count increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse triggering reductionVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the active shut-off circuitry from the ESD protection system and replaces it with a passive RC circuit. The active transistor-based shut-off mechanism is removed entirely, leaving only the resistor-capacitor network to control the trigger voltage, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining false triggering prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the active electronic control system (transistors, logic circuits) with a passive electrical system (resistor-capacitor network). The active shut-off transistor is replaced by a passive RC circuit that naturally filters the trigger signal, replacing complex active control with simple passive components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If active shut-off circuitry is used to control ESD protection, then ESD protection can be disabled during normal operation, but leakage paths are introduced and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD protection controlVSAvoidcircuit reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simple, inexpensive RC circuit instead of complex active shut-off circuitry. The passive components (resistor and capacitor) are basic, reliable elements that introduce no additional leakage paths, replacing the unreliable active control mechanism with a robust passive alternative

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The RC circuit automatically controls the ESD protection trigger voltage without requiring additional control logic or active management. The capacitor naturally charges and discharges through the resistor, providing self-regulating trigger voltage control that eliminates the need for complex active shut-off management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If active shut-off circuitry is used, then ESD protection can be dynamically controlled, but area occupation on the die increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic control capabilityVSAvoiddie area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the active shut-off transistor and associated control circuitry from the die, retaining only the essential RC components. This extraction eliminates the need for large isolation regions and reduces the overall area occupied by the ESD protection control mechanism while preserving dynamic control through the passive RC time constant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The RC circuit serves multiple functions: it filters normal signal variations, controls trigger voltage, and provides dynamic adaptation to ESD events without requiring separate active control circuits. This multi-functionality reduces the total component count and die area compared to dedicated active shut-off circuitry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If active shut-off circuitry is used, then ESD protection can be turned off during normal operation, but design and testing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation controlVSAvoiddesign and testing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex active control system with a simple passive RC circuit whose behavior is determined by basic electrical time constants. This substitution dramatically simplifies both design (no active control logic needed) and testing (predictable RC charging/discharging behavior) while maintaining operational control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces rate sensitivity, increases immunity to false triggering, and enhances reliability by eliminating the need for active shut-off circuits, conserving space and simplifying design and testing while maintaining effective ESD protection.

Implementation Method 1

a capacitor connected between the control node and an internal node... the capacitor and blocking circuit are selected so that a time constant representing the product of the capacitance and a diode leakage resistance is greater than the period of the time-varying signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

A blocking circuit such as a diode is connected between the protected node and the internal node to allow charging current to flow from the protected node to charge the capacitor and to provide a high impedance to the internal node to prevent or mitigate flow of leakage current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiode rectification: Diode

Implementation Method 3

The resistor in certain examples, the resistor allows current to flow from the capacitor to the reference node to increase the amplitude of the control voltage signal to turn the ESD protection element on in response to an ESD event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOhmic resistance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10749336B2ESD protection circuit with passive trigger voltage controlled shut-off
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US10749336B2 patent drawing
  • US10749336B2 patent drawing
  • US10749336B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed examples include an ESD protection circuit, including a transistor operative according to a control voltage signal at a control node to selectively conduct current from a protected node to a reference node during an ESD event, as well as a resistor connected between the control node and the reference node, a capacitor connected between the control node and an internal node, and a diode with an anode connected to the protected node and a cathode connected to the internal node to allow charging current to flow from the protected node to charge the capacitor and to provide a high impedance to the internal node to prevent or mitigate flow of leakage current from the internal node to the protected node to raise a trigger voltage of the protection circuit during normal operation.