Passive Hydrofoil Board via Weight Shift Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing personal watercraft, such as electrically powered hydrofoil surfboards, face challenges in achieving efficient control and performance while mimicking the surfing experience, requiring significant power and relying on movable surfaces for stability and steering, which complicates the design and increases the likelihood of mechanical failure.

Innovation Solution

A hydrofoil surfboard design that achieves passive stability through airfoil design, planform design, and span-wise twist distribution, allowing control via weight shift without movable surfaces, powered by a battery-powered electric motor for reduced noise and environmental impact, with speed control through throttle and weight shift.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If traditional powered surfboards use significant power (up to ten horsepower) to achieve surfing speeds, then speed performance is improved, but battery life and operational duration are severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurfing speedVSAvoidbattery operational life
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the stabilizing function from the propulsion system by incorporating a passive hydrofoil that provides automatic stability without requiring active control surfaces or additional power. This separation allows the motor to be smaller and more efficient, extending battery life while maintaining surfing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The hydrofoil is designed to provide self-stabilizing characteristics that automatically maintain board stability and depth control without requiring active intervention from moveable surfaces or complex control systems. This passive stability reduces the power needed for stabilization, allowing more efficient use of battery power for propulsion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If moveable surfaces and stabilizing components are added to control hydrofoil depth and direction, then control precision is improved, but device complexity and likelihood of mechanical failure increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidmechanical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes moveable stabilizing surfaces and active control components from the hydrofoil system. Instead, stability and control are achieved through the rider's weight shift, eliminating complex mechanical systems while maintaining precise control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical stabilizing surfaces and active control systems with a passive hydrofoil design that relies on hydrodynamic principles and rider weight distribution for stability and control. This substitution eliminates moving parts while preserving control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Power

If internal combustion engines are used to provide sufficient power for surfing speeds, then power output is improved, but noise and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion powerVSAvoidnoise and environmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces internal combustion engines with electric motors that drive the hydrofoil system. This substitution eliminates exhaust emissions and significantly reduces noise while providing sufficient power for surfing speeds through the efficient passive hydrofoil design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces power requirements, noise, and vibration, providing a surfing-like experience with improved control and stability, making the craft lighter, simpler, and easier to maintain, while allowing for tailored performance based on user skill levels.

Implementation Method 1

The hydrofoil has been designed to provide passive stability in the longitudinal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirfoil: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

a battery-powered electric motor (rather than an internal combustion engine) can be used to power the propulsion system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9586659B2Powered hydrofoil board
Publication Date: 2017.03.07 MHL CUSTOM INC
  • US9586659B2 patent drawing
  • US9586659B2 patent drawing
  • US9586659B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passively stable personal hydrofoil watercraft that has a flotation device, wherein a user can ride in a prone, kneeling, or standing position. The watercraft includes a strut having an upper end interconnected with the flotation device and lower end connected with a hydrofoil. The hydrofoil greatly reduces the power required to travel at higher speed. The watercraft also includes a propulsion system connected to the hydrofoil. Both longitudinal and directional control of the watercraft is via weight shift, eliminating the need of any movable surfaces. The flotation device, strut, and hydrofoil may be permanently interconnected or may be detachable.