Passive Artificial Knee Using Ground Reaction Force Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current above-knee prostheses in developing countries often employ single-axis joints with mechanical failures and high costs, limiting user satisfaction and accessibility for amputees due to socio-economic constraints.

Innovation Solution

A passive artificial knee design featuring a knee hinge assembly and locking hinge assembly that utilizes ground reaction force to lock and unlock rotation, eliminating the need for onboard energy and reducing mechanical failures, while being cost-effective and suitable for resource-constrained settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If passive artificial knee is designed to enable able-bodied kinematics, then user satisfaction and gait quality improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegait qualityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The knee assembly is divided into functionally independent components: a knee hinge assembly defining a knee axis, a locking hinge assembly defining a locking axis, and a post linking them. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function (knee flexion/extension, locking/unlocking) independently, achieving complex gait control through simple, modular elements rather than a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking and unlocking mechanism is entirely passive and self-actuating, utilizing ground reaction forces during the gait cycle to automatically lock the knee during heel strike/early-stance and unlock during mid-stance. No onboard energy source, motors, or active control systems are required—the terrain itself provides the energy to control knee rotation, eliminating complex power and control systems while maintaining high gait quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If passive artificial knee uses ground reaction force for locking mechanism, then reliability improves by reducing mechanical failures, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design converts the typically harmful or uncontrollable ground reaction forces into a beneficial locking and unlocking mechanism. During heel strike and early-stance, the ground reaction force creates an interfering relation that locks the knee; during mid-stance, the same force mechanism unlocks the knee. This transforms environmental forces that could cause instability into the primary control mechanism, improving reliability without adding complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates manual locks and complex mechanical failure points by using a passive locking mechanism. The interfering relation between the locking hinge assembly and knee hinge assembly creates automatic locking during critical gait phases, removing the need for manual intervention and reducing mechanical failures associated with traditional locked-knee designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If artificial knee is designed for developing countries with resource constraints, then accessibility and affordability improve, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The knee assembly is divided into functionally independent components: a knee hinge assembly defining a knee axis, a locking hinge assembly defining a locking axis, and a post linking them. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function (knee flexion/extension, locking/unlocking) independently, achieving complex gait control through simple, modular elements rather than a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design employs simple, passive mechanical components without expensive motors, sensors, or electronic control systems. The locking mechanism uses basic hinge assemblies and geometric interference rather than complex actuation systems, making the device suitable for low-cost manufacturing and deployment in resource-constrained settings while maintaining functional effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables able-bodied kinematics with minimal metabolic energy expenditure, reduces catastrophic failure risk, and meets socio-economic needs by being low-cost and energy-independent, making it suitable for transfemoral amputees in developing countries.

Implementation Method 1

A spring between the head plate and the linking member biases rotation of the linking member about the early-stance flexion axis to thereby direct the knee hinge and the first end of the post toward the head plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a ground reaction force applied to the artificial knee posterior to the locking axis causes an interfering relation at a point between the locking hinge assembly and the knee hinge assembly during heel strike and early-stance gait phases of an individual wearing the artificial knee, whereby rotation of the knee hinge causes radial compression of the knee hinge assembly at the point of interfering relation, thereby locking rotation of the post about the knee axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial compression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

shifting of the ground reaction force anterior to the locking axis during a mid-stance gait phase of the individual causes rotation of the post about the locking axis, thereby unlocking rotation of the post about the knee axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGround reaction force: Force

Data Source

PatentUS10405997B2Passive artificial knee
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH
  • US10405997B2 patent drawing
  • US10405997B2 patent drawing
  • US10405997B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passive artificial knee includes a knee hinge assembly defining a knee axis, a locking hinge assembly defining a locking axis, and a post linking the knee hinge assembly and the locking hinge assembly. A ground reaction force applied to the artificial knee posterior to the locking axis causes an interfering relation by compression of the locking hinge assembly and the knee hinge assembly during heel strike at early-stance gait phase of an individual wearing the artificial knee, thereby locking rotation of the post about the knee axis. Shifting of ground reaction force anterior to the locking axis during a mid-stance to late-stance gait phase of the individual causes rotation of the post about the locking axis, thereby unlocking rotation of the post about the knee axis and enabling flexion and subsequent swing phase extension of the passive artificial knee joint. The artificial knee is a passive joint that can be fabricated and maintained at low expense.