Passive Vacuum Valves for Gripping Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vacuum end-of-arm tools face challenges in maximizing force on objects due to incomplete contact between suction cups and objects, especially with objects of varying shapes, leading to reduced gripping ability and increased complexity and cost with active valve control systems.

Innovation Solution

A vacuum manifold with passive valves that are biased closed and open when an object engages the vacuum port, featuring a moving component with a channel, bleed orifice, and biasing mechanism, allowing for efficient vacuum application without active control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple vacuum sources are coupled to each suction cup independently, then the lack of contact between one suction cup and the object does not affect the operation of other suction cups, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation reliability of suction cupsVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the vacuum distribution into multiple independent zones by providing separate vacuum sources or separate vacuum lines to each suction cup, allowing independent operation of each cup while maintaining overall system functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A controller acts as an intermediary to manage multiple vacuum sources or to coordinate the operation of suction cups, enabling selective activation of individual cups based on contact detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If each suction cup is coupled to a single vacuum source in parallel with a valve for each suction cup, then valves can be independently controlled to open when the corresponding suction cup contacts the object, but the system becomes complex and expensive due to active control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suction cups are equipped with self-contained valves that automatically open or close based on local conditions (contact detection), eliminating the need for centralized active control while maintaining independent operation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Valves are pre-configured to respond automatically to contact conditions, so that when an object contacts a suction cup, the corresponding valve is already positioned to allow vacuum application without requiring active control signals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Force

If all suction cups are used to maximize vacuum force, then the gripping force is maximized, but incomplete contact between some suction cups and the object reduces overall gripping ability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum gripping forceVSAvoidgripping reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Each suction cup is equipped with its own valve that can be independently controlled or activated, allowing the system to apply vacuum force locally only to those cups that are in contact with the object, ensuring reliable gripping without wasting force on non-contacting cups

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents leakage from non-engaged ports, maximizes vacuum force on engaged ports, and simplifies the system by eliminating the need for active valve control, thereby enhancing gripping ability and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

when a vacuum is drawn in the vacuum chamber and the port is engaged by an object, a pressure on the second end of the moving component is reduced to overcome a force of the vacuum chamber and cause the moving component to passively move from the closed position to the open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The biasing mechanism is configured to bias the moving component to the closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP4171899B1Passive valves for vacuum manifolds
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 CRYOVAC INC
  • EP4171899B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP4171899B1 patent drawingFigure 1D~1E
  • EP4171899B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3B

AI summary

A valve can be located in a vacuum manifold between a vacuum chamber and a port. The valve includes a moving component that has opposing first and second ends and is movable between a closed position and an open position. A channel extends through the moving component between the first and second ends. A bleed orifice extends through the moving component between the channel and a side of the moving component. In the closed position, the first end of the moving component is in contact with the vacuum chamber. When a vacuum is drawn in the vacuum chamber and an object engages the port, the bleed orifice permits gas to such so that a pressure on the second end of the moving component is reduced to overcome a force of the biasing mechanism and cause the moving component to passively move from the closed position to the open position.