Patent Evaluation System Using Technical Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patent management platforms are unable to effectively evaluate the value of patents beyond technical hotspots, limiting their utility in guiding development and predicting future trends.

Innovation Solution

A patent evaluation method and system that uses natural language processing and complex network algorithms to aggregate patents into technical clusters, assigning scientific and technological attributes, and evaluating them within a global industry framework, enabling a comprehensive assessment of patent value.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If patent evaluation is performed using single-dimensional technical hot spot analysis, then the evaluation process is simple, but the evaluation comprehensiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process complexityVSAvoidpatent value evaluation comprehensiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent evaluation process is segmented into multiple independent dimensions including technical dimension (patent clustering, technology lifecycle), legal dimension (citation analysis, claim scope), and commercial dimension (market value, licensing potential). Each dimension is evaluated separately and then integrated to form a comprehensive patent value assessment, resolving the contradiction between simple process and comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system transitions from single-dimensional technical hot spot analysis to multi-dimensional evaluation by adding legal and commercial dimensions. This dimensional expansion allows comprehensive patent value assessment while maintaining systematic process structure through modular dimension design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If patent documents are evaluated individually without clustering, then the evaluation is straightforward, but the ability to reflect patent depth and breadth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation operation simplicityVSAvoidpatent technical depth and breadth measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Individual patent documents are merged into technical clusters based on semantic similarity and citation relationships. Patents with related technologies are grouped together to form clusters that reflect technical depth (number of related patents) and breadth (diversity of applications). This merging enables comprehensive measurement while maintaining operational simplicity through automated clustering algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Manual individual patent evaluation is replaced with automated text mining and natural language processing systems. The system automatically extracts technical features, performs semantic analysis, and computes patent relationships, replacing manual mechanical evaluation processes with intelligent automated systems that can handle large volumes of patents efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive multi-dimensional patent evaluation is implemented, then patent value assessment is thorough, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatent value evaluation comprehensivenessVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is designed as a dynamic modular architecture where different evaluation dimensions can be activated or deactivated based on specific needs. The system dynamically adjusts evaluation parameters, cluster thresholds, and dimension weights according to the evaluation context, allowing comprehensive evaluation capability while maintaining operational flexibility and reducing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system is designed with universal components that can serve multiple functions. For example, the patent clustering module serves both technical depth measurement and technology trend analysis. The citation analysis module functions for both legal strength assessment and influence measurement. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11847152B2Patent evaluation method and system that aggregate patents based on technical clustering
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 BEIJING INNOVATOR INFORMATION TECH CO LTD
  • US11847152B2 patent drawing
  • US11847152B2 patent drawing
  • US11847152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A patent evaluation method and system thereof are provided. The method includes collecting patent documents, and further includes the following steps: generating technical points and patent-affiliated technical points; generating technical clusters and patent-affiliated cluster; performing a patent evaluation in each of the technical clusters. The patent evaluation method and system proposed in the present invention aggregates the patents in a technical cluster mode through natural language processing and complex network algorithms, gives patents scientific and technological attributes, and places the patents in a global same industry for evaluation.