Patent Docketing Interface for Structured Data Entry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lack of predefined structure in communicating patent prosecution activities across different jurisdictions leads to inefficiencies and increased error risk in docketing information management, as parties use varied mechanisms and languages to describe activities, making it difficult for receiving parties to accurately categorize and input data into patent databases.

Innovation Solution

A user interface is introduced that allows parties to report patent prosecution activities in a structured manner by selecting from a predetermined list, reducing the number of screens and interfaces required, and ensuring consistent data entry across jurisdictions, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of docketing systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If parties use varied mechanisms and languages to describe patent prosecution activities, then communication flexibility is improved, but data accuracy and categorization reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication flexibilityVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the communication parameter from free-text descriptions to structured data entries with predefined categories and standardized formats. This parameter change maintains adaptability through customizable fields while ensuring reliability through consistent data structure and validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (the structured data entry interface) between the diverse communication methods of different parties and the patent database. This intermediary standardizes incoming data while preserving the ability to handle various input formats, thus maintaining both flexibility and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If manual categorization and data input methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity and time efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoiddata entry efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by providing predefined categories and structured templates before data entry occurs. This preparation reduces the complexity of manual categorization while significantly improving productivity, as users only need to select from predetermined options rather than create categories from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The structured data entry system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it standardizes data format, enables automatic categorization, validates input accuracy, and facilitates efficient database integration. This multi-functionality improves productivity without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If multiple screens and interfaces are required for data entry, then data validation is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validationVSAvoidinterface simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple validation functions and data entry steps into a single integrated interface. This combination maintains comprehensive data validation while improving ease of operation by eliminating the need to navigate through multiple separate screens and interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface is segmented into distinct functional sections (activity selection, data entry, validation, submission) within a single unified screen. This segmentation allows comprehensive validation while maintaining operational simplicity through organized, logical layout and clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11526566B2User interface for providing docketing data
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 BLACK HILLS IP HLDG LLC
  • US11526566B2 patent drawing
  • US11526566B2 patent drawing
  • US11526566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for receiving docketing data are disclosed. The methods and systems perform operations comprising: obtaining, by a first party, a patent file wrapper from a publicly accessible database of patent records, the patent file wrapper including a plurality of patent documents; receiving, from the first party, user input that tags a patent document of the plurality of patent documents in the patent file wrapper, wherein the patent document that is tagged is associated with a patent activity that occurred within a threshold period of time; and transmitting, to a second party by the first party, a communication that includes the tagged patent document.