Patent Mapping System for Reducing Irrelevant Search Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current patent search tools produce large numbers of irrelevant results and fail to present results in a manner that allows for quick relevancy determinations, lacking detail on how to adjust searches for relevant results, and present documents in a traditional format.

Innovation Solution

The system employs patent mapping by identifying and structuring patent documents using claim concepts and limitation concepts in a hierarchical fashion, allowing for efficient screening and analysis by interweaving document portions and linking them, and providing user interfaces for quick review and adjustment of search criteria.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If Boolean queries are used to search patent documents, then the search can be performed with simple operators, but large numbers of irrelevant results are produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch operation simplicityVSAvoidnumber of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the search process into multiple hierarchical levels: (1) initial Boolean query filtering, (2) concept extraction from retrieved documents, (3) concept-based re-ranking and filtering. This segmentation allows the system to first use simple operators for broad retrieval, then progressively refine results through concept analysis, reducing irrelevant results while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces concept extraction and concept matching as an intermediary step between the Boolean query and final results. Instead of directly returning all Boolean-matched documents, the system extracts concepts from documents and matches them against search criteria, acting as a mediator that filters and ranks results to reduce irrelevant matches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional patent search tools are used, then documents are presented in traditional format, but quick relevancy determinations cannot be made

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument presentation formatVSAvoidtime for relevancy determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary concept extraction and analysis during the search process itself, rather than requiring users to manually review traditional patent documents. Concepts are extracted and matched in advance, and results are pre-ranked based on concept relevance, allowing users to make quick relevancy determinations without manually analyzing entire patent documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs visual indicators and highlighting (analogous to color changes) to indicate concept matches and relevance levels in search results. This allows users to quickly identify relevant portions of patent documents without reading the entire document, reducing the time required for relevancy determination while maintaining traditional document presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If freeform text search is accepted, then user-friendly searching is enabled, but the tools are still limited to Boolean queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch input flexibilityVSAvoidsearch system functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses natural language processing and concept extraction as an intermediary layer between the user's freeform text input and the underlying Boolean query system. The system automatically converts freeform text into structured concept searches, maintaining user-friendly input flexibility while managing system complexity through automated processing rather than requiring complex multi-functional search tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If search results are not adjusted, then the initial search is completed quickly, but relevant results cannot be identified among irrelevant ones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch completion speedVSAvoidresult relevancy accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary concept extraction and relevance scoring during the initial search phase, before final result presentation. This preliminary analysis allows the system to pre-ranking results based on concept match quality, so that while the initial search completes quickly, the most relevant results are positioned prominently for immediate identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where concept match results inform subsequent search refinements. The system analyzes concept relevance in initial results and uses this feedback to automatically adjust search parameters or suggest refinements, improving result relevancy accuracy while maintaining efficient search completion through iterative rather than exhaustive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9659071B2Patent mapping
Publication Date: 2017.05.23 SCHWEGMAN LUNDBERG & WOESSNER P A
  • US9659071B2 patent drawing
  • US9659071B2 patent drawing
  • US9659071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present subject matter provides systems, methods, software, and data structures for patent mapping, storage, and searching. Some such embodiments include mapping patent documents, claims, and claim limitations. Some further embodiments provide for searching a universe of patent documents by patent document, claim, limitation, class, element, or concept.