Path Planning Autopilot for Vehicle Path Joining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autopilot systems for vehicles struggle with maintaining high performance when a vehicle is far from the desired path, often resulting in inefficient guidance and oscillations when joining a path, due to tradeoffs between small and large signal regimes.

Innovation Solution

A path planning autopilot system that uses a combination of feedback and feed-forward control, allowing direct control over constraints like maximum steering angle and rate, and calculates efficient joining paths with continuous curvature, using clothoids and other segments to guide the vehicle from an arbitrary initial configuration to a desired path, regardless of distance from the path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high feedback gain is used to keep cross track error small in the small signal regime, then manufacturing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to steep approaches and oscillation when joining the path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross track errorVSAvoidpath joining stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The autopilot system dynamically adjusts control parameters based on the vehicle's distance from the desired path. When far from the path (large signal regime), the system uses different control gains and strategies compared to when close to the path (small signal regime). This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain stability during path joining while achieving high precision during path following, resolving the contradiction between precision and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (such as feedback gain, prediction horizon, and control authority) based on the operating regime. In the large signal regime, parameters are adjusted to prevent oscillation and ensure stable approach, while in the small signal regime, parameters are optimized for high precision tracking. This parameter adaptation resolves the contradiction by optimizing performance for each specific operating condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional feedback autopilot is used to avoid undesirable large-signal behavior through heuristic limits, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to inefficient large-signal guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelarge-signal behavior stabilityVSAvoidguidance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control space is segmented into different regimes based on the vehicle's distance from the desired path. The system identifies whether the vehicle is in the small signal regime (close to path) or large signal regime (far from path) and applies appropriate control strategies for each segment. This segmentation allows efficient guidance in the large signal regime without compromising reliability, as each regime has optimized control parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The autopilot dynamically switches between different control strategies based on the current operating regime. In the large signal regime, the system uses control laws optimized for efficient approach and path joining, while in the small signal regime, it switches to high-precision tracking modes. This dynamic strategy selection improves overall productivity while maintaining reliability across all operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If feedback control is used to guide vehicle close to desired path, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases when vehicle is far from path due to inefficient approach

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath following accuracyVSAvoidpath joining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autopilot performs preliminary actions to efficiently bring the vehicle from far positions toward the desired path before engaging high-precision feedback control. In the large signal regime, the system uses predictive control and optimized trajectory planning to rapidly reduce cross-track error, preparing the vehicle for the subsequent precision tracking phase. This preliminary efficient approach reduces the time spent in low-precision regimes without compromising final path following accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2847643B1Path planning autopilot
Publication Date: 2019.07.10 TRIMBLE INC
  • EP2847643B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2847643B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP2847643B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A path planning autopilot guides vehicles even when they are far from a desired path.