Autonomous Vehicle Path Prediction With Semantic Behavior Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle trajectory determination methods require high computational power, leading to inefficient computation and slowed reaction times, which can result in real-world complications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing semantic behavior filtering to predict actions of agents in a scene by filtering out low-quality predictions based on contextual information, reducing compute resources and improving prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional path determination methods are used, then comprehensive trajectory options can be generated, but computational power requirements become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the path determination process into distinct modules: prediction module (generating candidate trajectories), evaluation module (assessing trajectories against constraints), and selection module (choosing optimal path). This segmentation allows each module to focus on specific computational tasks, reducing overall computational power requirements while maintaining comprehensive trajectory analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction module generates candidate trajectories in advance before the evaluation phase. By pre-computing multiple possible paths based on historical data and current state, the system reduces real-time computational burden during critical decision-making moments, allowing the evaluation module to work with pre-prepared options rather than generating them on-the-fly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive predictions are made for all agents, then all possible behaviors are considered, but reaction time becomes too slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior prediction completenessVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and prioritizes only the most relevant agents for prediction based on their proximity to the autonomous vehicle and potential impact on trajectory. By taking out and focusing computational resources on critical agents rather than all agents in the environment, the system maintains comprehensive prediction for important targets while reducing overall computation time to meet reaction time requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Different prediction thoroughness is applied to different agents based on their local importance. High-priority agents (close proximity, potential conflict) receive detailed multi-trajectory predictions, while low-priority agents receive simplified or aggregated predictions. This local quality differentiation maintains prediction completeness for critical decisions while reducing time loss from unnecessary comprehensive analysis of all agents

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If all predictions are processed, then no high-quality predictions are lost, but computational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction qualityVSAvoidcomputation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of prediction processing based on contextual factors such as scene complexity, vehicle speed, and proximity to intersections or pedestrians. In high-risk scenarios, the system processes more predictions with higher quality thresholds; in low-risk scenarios, it reduces processing depth. This dynamic adaptation maintains prediction quality when needed while improving computation efficiency during normal operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12617390B2Path generation based on predicted actions
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US12617390B2 patent drawing
  • US12617390B2 patent drawing
  • US12617390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are methods and systems for semantic behavior filtering for prediction improvement. A method for operating an autonomous vehicle is provided. The method includes obtaining, by at least one processor, semantic image data associated with an environment in which an autonomous vehicle is operating. The method includes determining, by the at least one processor, at least one agent in the environment. The method includes determining a predicted action for the at least one agent. The method includes determining an agent predicted path for the at least one agent. The method includes determining a vehicle path of the autonomous vehicle. The method includes determining a predicted collision of the at least one agent and the autonomous vehicle. The method includes simulating actions to avoid the predicted collision. The method includes categorizing the predicted collision as a primary predicted collision based on the simulating actions.