Path Tracking for Office Device Placement Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current device management tools lack an effective solution to analyze traffic patterns and optimize the placement of output devices in office environments, leading to inefficiencies in travel time, waiting time, and capital expenditure.

Innovation Solution

A path tracking system that uses a host terminal with GPS and accelerometer capabilities to communicate with output devices and beacon devices via short-range communication, recording path details such as device identifiers, signal strength, and time spent, which are then processed to optimize device placement and reduce operational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If device location is optimized based on floorplan and distances to employee desks, then device placement efficiency is improved, but traffic pattern analysis capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice placement efficiencyVSAvoidtraffic pattern information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary path tracking and data collection before device placement optimization. Mobile devices continuously record user movement paths, stop locations, and device interaction data in advance, building a comprehensive traffic pattern database that informs subsequent optimization decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where collected path data is analyzed to generate optimization recommendations, which are then applied to device placement. The system continuously monitors usage patterns and adjusts device locations based on accumulated evidence of actual user behavior and traffic flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If output devices are placed to maximize accessibility, then user convenience is improved, but travel time and waiting time are not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidtravel and waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies optimal device locations by analyzing historical path data before devices are physically relocated. By examining accumulated information about user routes, stop frequencies, and device usage patterns, the system determines placement configurations that will minimize future travel and waiting times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of device placement based on empirical data. Device locations, accessibility parameters, and configuration settings are adjusted according to quantified metrics derived from path analysis, such as average travel distance, frequency of use, and peak usage times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If path tracking data is collected continuously, then device placement optimization is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice placement optimizationVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential and relevant features from continuous path tracking data for optimization purposes. Instead of processing all raw movement data, the system identifies and extracts key metrics such as stop locations, device interaction events, and path frequency patterns, filtering out redundant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial processing to the full dataset by focusing on specific time periods, user groups, or device types when performing optimization analysis. This selective approach processes only the necessary subset of data required for each optimization decision, reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system improves device placement by analyzing user paths, reducing travel and waiting times, and optimizing capital expenditure by identifying the most convenient and underutilized locations for output devices.

Implementation Method 1

provisions (e.g., GPS receiver, accelerometer, triangulation of cells or other transmitters of reference positions, etc.) to provide position information regarding then-current position of the host terminal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGPS:

Implementation Method 2

provisions (e.g., GPS receiver, accelerometer, triangulation of cells or other transmitters of reference positions, etc.) to provide position information

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 3

communicates by short-range point-to-point communication, such as by Bluetooth, BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy), other similar technology, etc.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBluetooth Low Energy:

Data Source

PatentEP3229535B1Device management based on tracking path taken by user
Publication Date: 2019.06.26 RICOH CO LTD
  • EP3229535B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3229535B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3229535B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A path tracking application (or other mobile application) hosted on a host terminal is configured to track a path taken by the terminal, by communicating with output devices and beacon devices along the path.