Inkjet Printing Pathfinder Correction for Positional Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inkjet printing systems face inherent positioning errors due to inaccuracies in robotic positioning and variations in printhead orientation and object dimensions, making accurate printing challenging without costly calibration.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of 'pathfinder' dot patterns printed in a preliminary pass, analyzed to calculate corrections, which are then applied in a subsequent full printing pass to compensate for positioning errors, ensuring accurate alignment and registration of dot patterns on surfaces with known tolerances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If system calibration is used to correct positioning errors, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting accuracyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by printing test dot patterns (pathfinders) before the actual printing process. These pre-printed patterns serve as reference markers that enable subsequent measurement and correction of positioning errors without requiring complex real-time calibration systems during production printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating duplicate reference dot patterns at known positions and geometric relationships. By printing these identical reference patterns multiple times across different swathes, the system can compare actual printed positions against the known reference positions to calculate and correct positioning errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If robotic positioning systems are used to move printhead and substrate, then productivity is improved, but positioning accuracy deteriorates due to inherent errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting throughputVSAvoiddot placement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using machine vision systems to capture images of the pre-printed pathfinder dot patterns, calculate actual positioning deviations from expected positions, and use this feedback information to correct subsequent printing operations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism compensates for robotic positioning errors while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting printing parameters based on measured positioning errors. The system calculates correction values from the analyzed dot patterns and modifies printing data parameters (such as dot positions and timing) to compensate for identified positioning deviations, thereby maintaining accuracy despite robotic motion variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If high resolution printing is achieved on nominal surfaces, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability to surfaces with varying dimensions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting resolutionVSAvoidsurface variation tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action by printing adaptive reference dot patterns that are specifically designed to account for surface variations. These pathfinder patterns are printed first on the actual object surface (not just a nominal model), allowing the system to measure and adapt to the real surface geometry and dimensional variations before performing high-resolution printing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the printing system adaptive and flexible rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts printing parameters based on real-time measurements of the actual object surface and printed dot patterns, enabling it to accommodate variations in object dimensions and curvature while maintaining high printing resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively corrects print position errors, enabling accurate printing on objects with curved surfaces and varying dimensions by applying necessary adjustments to the printing data, thereby improving printing resolution and registration.

Implementation Method 1

The image processing module is configured to analyze the relative positions of the printed dots in the printed second swathe data, and to identify groups of dots which comprise the at least one dot pattern.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage processing: Image Processing

Data Source

PatentUS11633961B2Printing methods and systems
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 GLOBAL INKJET SYST
  • US11633961B2 patent drawing
  • US11633961B2 patent drawing
  • US11633961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a system including a printhead for printing an image on at least one surface, wherein the at least one surface differs in shape from a nominal surface by a known tolerance, and wherein the printhead and the at least one surface move relative to each other along a predetermined print path comprising at least one swathe. Small dot patterns (referred to as “pathfinders”) are printed on a surface of the object in a preliminary printing pass, then the printed dot patterns are analyzed, for example with a machine vision system. The necessary corrections may then be calculated from this analysis and applied to a subsequent full printing pass.