Digital Pathology View Synchronization Without Screen-Sharing Lag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collaborative review systems for digital pathology face challenges such as low-resolution image transmission, significant lag time, difficulty in indicating specific areas of interest, complex workflow integration, and inefficient case management, which hinder accurate and efficient diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A system that enables real-time collaboration by transmitting high-resolution digital pathology images through zoom level, viewport rotation, and cursor coordinates, allowing practitioners to synchronize their views without sharing full video data, and incorporating AI integration and case management features for efficient review.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If screen sharing applications are used for collaborative review, then collaboration is enabled, but image resolution is reduced and critical detail is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidimage resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the necessary viewing parameters (zoom level, viewport rotation, cursor coordinates) rather than the entire image data. This allows practitioners to view high-resolution images locally while sharing only the essential viewing state information, maintaining both image quality and collaboration capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of sharing the actual image data through screen sharing applications, the system creates and shares a simplified representation (copy) of the viewing state containing only metadata parameters. This copy enables collaboration without compromising the original high-resolution image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If screen sharing applications are used for collaborative review, then collaboration is enabled, but lag time increases and real-time interaction is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidlag time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential viewing parameters needed for collaboration rather than transmitting full screen data. This extraction of minimal necessary information (zoom level, rotation, cursor coordinates) dramatically reduces transmission time and eliminates the lag associated with traditional screen sharing, enabling real-time interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If traditional collaborative systems are used, then basic review is possible, but workflow integration is complex and requires multiple applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview functionalityVSAvoidworkflow integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple previously separate functions (image viewing, annotation, case management, AI integration) into a single unified collaborative review platform. This consolidation maintains reliable review functionality while simplifying the workflow by eliminating the need to switch between multiple applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The collaborative review system is designed with multi-functionality, serving as a universal platform that handles image viewing, annotation, case management, and AI findings integration all in one interface. This universality reduces device complexity and streamlines the overall workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If high-resolution images are shared through network transmission, then image quality is maintained, but network bandwidth is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transmits only the minimal necessary data for collaboration - the viewing parameters (zoom level, viewport rotation, cursor coordinates) - rather than the entire high-resolution image data. This extraction approach maintains image quality by allowing local viewing of full-resolution images while consuming minimal network bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a lightweight copy containing only the viewing state metadata rather than duplicating the full image data. This metadata copy enables high-resolution image sharing without the network bandwidth consumption that would result from transmitting actual image files.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250356487A1Systems and methods for collaborative review of electronic images in digital pathology
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 PAIGE AI INC
  • US20250356487A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356487A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356487A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method for collaborative review of digital pathology images. The method may include initiating a collaboration session including a plurality of practitioners on an electronic network, receiving an indication of one or more digital pathology images to be reviewed in the collaboration session from a first session instance associated with a first practitioner, providing the indication to at least a second session instance associated with a second practitioner, receiving viewing data including zoom level, viewport rotation, and cursor coordinates associated with the first session instance, the viewing data not including video data, and providing the viewing data to at least the second session instance.