Patient-Centered Quality Control for Laboratory Analyzers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laboratory analyzers often fail to detect intermittent and transient errors due to infrequent quality control analyses, leading to undetected analytical defects and increased costs, delays, and unnecessary testing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a patient-centered quality control analysis that uses average of deltas (AoD) and standard deviation of duplicates (SDD) calculations to detect systematic and random errors by comparing sequential patient test results, triggering immediate assessment and potential reanalysis on an alternate analyzer if errors are detected.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional quality control analysis is used with infrequent testing, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to undetected analytical errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidquality control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses patient test results themselves to perform quality control analysis through AoD and SDD calculations. The patient data serves dual purposes: clinical diagnosis and analyzer performance monitoring, eliminating the need for separate control materials and simplifying the QC process while improving error detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The quality control system processes the same patient test results for both clinical purposes and analyzer monitoring purposes. The AoD and SDD calculations utilize existing patient data to simultaneously assess patient status and detect analytical errors, making the system multi-functional without requiring additional resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional quality control with stabilized control materials is used, then measurement precision is maintained, but loss of time increases due to non-commutability issues and frequent recalibration needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalytical accuracyVSAvoidquality control time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces expensive, time-consuming stabilized control materials with readily available patient test results. Patient data is continuously generated for clinical purposes and is immediately utilized for QC analysis, eliminating the time delay associated with running separate control samples and reducing recalibration frequency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses patient test results as an intermediary to indirectly assess analyzer performance. Rather than directly measuring control materials, the AoD and SDD calculations derive analyzer accuracy information from sequential patient measurements, providing a timely and efficient QC mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If delta checks are used to detect analytical error, then some errors are detected, but measurement precision deteriorates due to limited utility in detecting small errors and high false positive rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoiderror detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple error detection metrics (AoD and SDD) into a unified QC framework. By analyzing both the average change in patient values and the variability of duplicate measurements, the system achieves more accurate error detection than single-metric approaches like traditional delta checks, reducing false positives while maintaining sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240426850A1Devices and methods to determine whether to calibrate a laboratory analyzer
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 CCQCC CORP
  • US20240426850A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426850A1 patent drawing
  • US20240426850A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, and methods detect an error in a laboratory analyzer. A method can include determining a time delta between consecutive measurements of an analyte made on a patient using a laboratory analyzer, determining whether the time delta is within a specified number of days window, a specified time of day window, and is within a same season, determining a measurement value delta between the first and second measurements of the consecutive measurements if the time delta is within the specified number of days, time of day windows, and the same season, calculating an average of deltas, the average of deltas including a measurement value delta between the consecutive measurements, determining whether the average of deltas is within a specified range of acceptable average of delta values, and issuing an alert if the average of deltas is not within the specified range of acceptable average of delta values.