Patient Data Management System for Biomarker Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical diagnostic systems are limited in their ability to effectively process and analyze multiple sets of patient data, often relying on physician interpretation and are hindered by the volume of new research, which can lead to delayed and uncertain medical decisions due to regulatory oversight and the integration of Electronic Medical Records.

Innovation Solution

The Patient Data Management System enables physicians to customize analysis of patient-specific data using a Digital Library, allowing for the comparison of patient data with ailment-specific biomarkers and archetypes, facilitating data-driven diagnoses and reducing the need for extensive testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If physicians manually review patient test data to diagnose ailments, then diagnostic accuracy can be maintained through physician expertise, but the process is time-consuming and limited by the physician's ability to process information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidtime for data review and diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated analysis system that bridges the gap between raw patient data and physician diagnosis. The system automatically compares patient test data against ailment archetypes and control data to generate preliminary diagnoses and risk assessments, reducing the time physicians spend on manual data review while maintaining diagnostic accuracy through structured computational analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a computational copy of the physician's diagnostic expertise by encoding ailment-specific knowledge, control data, and analysis methodologies into an automated system. This digital replica can process large volumes of patient data quickly and consistently, freeing physicians from routine data review while preserving diagnostic standards through programmed medical knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system processes multiple sets of patient data to provide comprehensive analysis, then diagnostic thoroughness is improved, but the complexity of data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive data analysis capabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex data processing task into distinct modular components: data collection from multiple sources, comparison against ailment archetypes, statistical analysis against control data, and generation of diagnostic reports. Each module handles specific aspects of analysis independently, making the overall system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining comprehensive analysis capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal analysis framework that can process multiple types of patient data (test results, demographic information, historical records) and apply the same comparative methodology across different ailments and data types. This multi-functional approach consolidates processing complexity into a single versatile system rather than requiring separate specialized systems for each data type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the system uses automated analysis to speed up diagnosis, then productivity is improved, but reliability may be compromised due to regulatory oversight and outdated algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic speedVSAvoidaccuracy of automated diagnosis
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where physicians can review and correct automated analysis results, and where the system continuously compares its findings against emerging medical research and updated control data. This feedback loop ensures that automated diagnoses remain reliable by allowing human oversight and continuous adaptation to new medical knowledge while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to dynamically update its analysis parameters and algorithms in response to new medical research and changing diagnostic standards. By periodically refreshing its control data and analysis methodologies, the system maintains reliability despite rapid changes in medical science, while preserving the speed benefits of automated processing through continuous optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8930212B2Patient data management apparatus for comparing patient data with ailment archetypes to determine correlation with established ailment biomarkers
Publication Date: 2015.01.06 WAVI
  • US8930212B2 patent drawing
  • US8930212B2 patent drawing
  • US8930212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The Medical Diagnostic Apparatus implements a physician-operated medical data analysis system for assisting a physician in identifying ailments and conditions which correlate to anomalies identified in a set of patient medical data relating to an identified patient. This system includes a plurality of biomarkers which relate to interpreting patient medical data and possible ailments associated with patient medical data. A data characterization module displays biomarkers selected by a physician and a set of patient medical data, collected from and about an identified patient, to compare the set of patient medical data with biomarkers of known ailments to enable the physician to identify an ailment representative of the patient medical data.