Selective Patient Data Routing for Emergency Care

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In emergency medical situations, there is a challenge in quickly routing patient data from field devices to the most appropriate treatment centers with the necessary facilities and staff, leading to potential delays in critical treatments like PCI for STEMI patients.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a central server to route medical event data from field devices to selected treatment centers based on user-configurable rules, location, and scheduling information, ensuring that relevant data is delivered to destinations with the capability to provide timely and appropriate care.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If patient data is routed to all treatment centers, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but data transmission time and network load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive coverageVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the treatment center network into multiple geographic regions, with each regional server managing a specific subset of treatment centers. This segmentation allows patient data to be routed to only the relevant regional servers first, reducing the time and network load compared to broadcasting to all treatment centers simultaneously, while still ensuring comprehensive coverage through hierarchical distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing regional server infrastructure and pre-configuring routing rules based on treatment center capabilities and geographic locations. When patient data needs to be transmitted, the routing decision is made quickly using pre-defined criteria, eliminating the need for real-time evaluation of all treatment centers and thus reducing data transmission time while maintaining reliable coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If patient data is transmitted to multiple destinations simultaneously, then treatment options are maximized, but system complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment optionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system dynamically adjusts data transmission based on real-time conditions such as treatment center availability, patient condition severity, and geographic proximity. Instead of statically transmitting to all destinations simultaneously, the system adaptively selects and prioritizes destinations, reducing system complexity while maintaining versatility in providing multiple treatment options when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions and treatment centers receive different subsets of patient data based on their specific capabilities, geographic location, and relevance to the patient's condition. This local quality approach ensures that each destination receives only the necessary data for its specific role, reducing overall system complexity while preserving adaptability to provide appropriate treatment options at each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If all treatment centers receive patient data, then care coordination is improved, but network bandwidth and processing resources are overutilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecare coordinationVSAvoidnetwork bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into regional zones with dedicated servers managing data distribution within each zone. Patient data is transmitted only to relevant regional servers based on geographic proximity and treatment capability matching, significantly reducing overall network bandwidth consumption compared to broadcasting to all treatment centers, while maintaining effective care coordination within each region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by transmitting patient data only to a subset of treatment centers that are most relevant to the specific patient case, rather than to all treatment centers. This selective transmission reduces network bandwidth and processing resource utilization while still achieving effective care coordination through the hierarchical regional server structure that can relay information as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10504618B2Selectively routing patient data between field devices and treatment center destinations
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 PHYSIO CONTROL CORP
  • US10504618B2 patent drawing
  • US10504618B2 patent drawing
  • US10504618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for routing event data from a field device, such as an external defibrillator, to a selected subset of a plurality of possible destinations are described. The event data may include physiological data of the patient, such as a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The destinations may be associated with one of a plurality of patient treatment centers, and may include, as examples, computing device, printers, displays, personal digital assistants, or web-accessible accounts. In some examples, a server maintains user-configurable information or rules for at least some of the destinations, and uses the information or rules for determining whether event data received from a field device is routed to the destination. In some examples, the server may also make the routing determination based on an analysis of event data, such as a determination as to whether the event data indicates that the patient is suspected to be experiencing an acute myocardial infarction.