Automated Patient Disease Context Identification Using Evidentiary Timelines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In clinical workflows, clinicians face challenges in gathering and analyzing patient records due to the complexity of radiology and pathology exams, often leading to incomplete context and increased risk of misdiagnosis, as existing methods do not effectively consider the semantic content or relationships between exams.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for classifying and clustering medical reports, including radiology and pathology reports, by processing documents, extracting entities, determining anatomy inference, and using machine learning to estimate similarities and visualize relevant reports, thereby linking and presenting relevant patient data in different disease contexts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If clinicians manually gather and analyze patient records, then they can review detailed information, but the process is time-consuming and prone to incomplete context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of patient contextVSAvoidtime to gather and analyze records
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the gathering and analysis of patient records without requiring manual clinician intervention. The automated workflow extracts entities, determines anatomy inferences, estimates similarities, and clusters reports independently, allowing clinicians to review pre-organized results rather than manually processing raw data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of reviewing records is replaced with an automated computational system using NLP, machine learning models, and clustering algorithms. The system processes documents, extracts entities, and organizes reports automatically, substituting human manual analysis with computational automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If existing methods are used to review prior exams, then the process is simple, but semantic content and relationships between exams are not effectively considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of review processVSAvoidsemantic content and relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer between the raw medical reports and the clinician review. This intermediary automatically extracts entities, determines anatomy inferences, estimates semantic similarities using machine learning, and clusters reports by disease context, thereby preserving and organizing semantic information that would otherwise be lost in simple chronological review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of patient records before clinician review. By pre-extracting entities, pre-determining anatomy inferences, and pre-clustering reports by disease context, the system prepares the information in advance, making the actual clinician review simpler while ensuring semantic relationships are captured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If all prior exams are reviewed to ensure complete context, then diagnostic accuracy improves, but the complexity of analysis increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large set of prior exams into smaller, meaningful clusters based on disease context and semantic similarity. Instead of presenting all exams uniformly, the system divides them into grouped categories (e.g., by anatomy, pathology type, or disease progression), making the complex set manageable while ensuring comprehensive coverage of relevant context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the organizational parameter from simple chronological ordering to semantic similarity-based clustering. By transforming the data structure from time-based sequences to meaning-based groups, the system reduces analytical complexity while improving diagnostic reliability through better contextual organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240170115A1Automated identification of patient disease context using evidentiary timelines
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20240170115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240170115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240170115A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for classifying medical reports of a patient, including: receiving a plurality of patient medical reports; processing the plurality of patient medical reports to produce a processed report that extracts patient medical information; estimating the similarity between the plurality of medical reports based upon the extracted patient medical information; clustering similar medical reports; inferring a group type for the clustered medical reports and labeling the clustered medical reports with the inferred group type; and visualizing the labelled clustered medical reports on a display.