Patient Feedback for Atrial Fibrillation Burden Attenuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices struggle to effectively identify patient behaviors contributing to increased atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, leading to inadequate attenuation or elimination of such patterns.

Innovation Solution

A medical device system that includes a patient interface to ask patients to identify behaviors and provides personalized suggestions to change behaviors likely contributing to increased AF burden, using machine learning models trained on parametric data to determine risk levels and suggest behavior modifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system automatically detects AF burden patterns without patient behavior input, then the monitoring process is simpler and faster, but the identification accuracy of contributing behaviors is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracy of behaviors contributing to AF burdenVSAvoidsystem complexity including patient interface components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where it automatically detects AF burden patterns, presents relevant behavior questions to patients, receives patient responses, and uses these responses to refine and update the AF burden analysis. This iterative feedback process improves identification accuracy by incorporating patient self-reporting data with automated physiological monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the AF burden analysis into distinct components: automated physiological signal processing, patient behavior questionnaires, and integrated analysis. By separating these functions, the system can maintain simplicity in each component while achieving high overall accuracy through their coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the system provides personalized behavior suggestions to patients, then the effectiveness of attenuating AF burden increases, but the device complexity and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of attenuating AF burden patternVSAvoidcomplexity of suggestion generation and delivery system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters such as question timing, suggestion personalization level, and notification frequency based on detected AF burden patterns and patient responses. This adaptive parameter adjustment allows the system to maintain high effectiveness in attenuating AF burden while avoiding unnecessary complexity through context-aware operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables patients to self-report behaviors through simple interface questions and receives personalized suggestions autonomously without requiring clinician intervention. This self-service approach improves reliability of AF burden attenuation while minimizing operational complexity by empowering patients to participate in their own monitoring and management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the system collects detailed patient behavior data through interfaces, then the accuracy of AF burden analysis improves, but the operational burden on patients increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of AF burden pattern identificationVSAvoidease of patient interaction with behavior questioning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the specific questions and interaction depth to the local context of each patient's AF burden pattern and individual needs. Rather than uniformly collecting all possible behavior data, the system adapts the scope and type of questions to what is most relevant for each patient's specific situation, maintaining precision while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by collecting only the most relevant behavior data needed for accurate AF burden analysis at any given time, rather than requiring comprehensive continuous data collection. This selective data collection approach maintains measurement precision for the critical AF burden patterns while significantly reducing operational burden on patients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260045366A1Health event prediction and patient feedback system
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 MEDTRONIC INC
  • US20260045366A1 patent drawing
  • US20260045366A1 patent drawing
  • US20260045366A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical device system includes a memory; and processing circuitry in communication with the memory. The processing circuitry is configured to receive parametric data for a plurality of parameters of a patient, determine, based on the parametric data, an atrial fibrillation (AF) burden of the patient over a period of time, wherein the AF burden of the patient over the period of time includes a pattern of increased AF burden; output, for display by a user device, a request to identify whether the patient engaged in each patient behavior of a set of patient behaviors during the period of time; and determine, based on receiving a response indicating that the patient engaged in one or more patient behaviors of the set of patient behaviors, a suggestion to change at least a subset of the one or more patient behaviors to attenuate the pattern of increased AF burden.