Patient Financial Liability Estimation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Medical service providers face difficulties in accurately estimating patients' financial liability due to complex health insurance parameters and varying factors, leading to inefficient collection of payments and inadequate patient informed decision-making regarding elective procedures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that accesses established payments and historical data to estimate the expected payment for a medical service, combining this with patient-specific healthcare coverage parameters to provide accurate financial information on the patient's liability, using a tiered data approach for reliable estimates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If medical service providers attempt to collect greater portions of patient costs at the point of service, then payment collection efficiency improves, but accuracy of financial liability estimation deteriorates due to complex insurance parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment collection efficiencyVSAvoidfinancial liability estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of patient financial liability before the actual service is rendered or at the point of service. It calculates expected payments by analyzing historical claims data, established payments, and patient-specific insurance parameters in advance, allowing providers to collect accurate payments upfront rather than attempting collection after service rendering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes complex insurance parameters, historical claims data, and patient information to generate simplified payment estimates. This intermediary system bridges the gap between complex insurance adjudication rules and the need for simple, accurate point-of-service payment collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If providers use simplified collection methods like co-pay only, then ease of operation improves, but financial recovery deteriorates due to insufficient collection of total patient liability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayment collection simplicityVSAvoidfinancial recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the manual, complex process of calculating patient liability with an automated computational system. The system automatically processes insurance parameters, historical data, and patient information to generate accurate payment estimates, eliminating the need for manual calculations while maintaining simplicity of operation at the point of service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of energy

If providers balance bill patients after service, then financial recovery may improve, but time consumption and effectiveness deteriorate due to delayed collection and accounts receivable write-offs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial recoveryVSAvoidcollection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and determines the exact patient payment amount in advance, before the service is rendered or at the point of service. This preliminary determination eliminates the need for post-service balance billing and allows for immediate collection, preventing delays and reducing accounts receivable write-offs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If accurate financial estimation systems are implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases due to data access and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial liability estimation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed as a multi-functional platform that can process multiple types of data sources (established payments, historical claims data, patient-specific parameters) and serve multiple purposes (estimation, prediction, analysis). This universal system handles various data formats and insurance parameter types through a unified computational framework, managing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8645162B2Method and system for estimating the financial liability of a patient for a medical service
Publication Date: 2014.02.04 CHANGE HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US8645162B2 patent drawing
  • US8645162B2 patent drawing
  • US8645162B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method involving a medical service for a patient includes estimating an expected payment associated with the medical service for the patient based on a set of data including payments for similar medical services provided to a population of individuals. The method also includes estimating a cost expected to be borne by the patient for incurring the medical service based on the estimated expected payment and based on a set of parameters associated with a healthcare coverage plan of the patient. The method further includes presenting financial information that communicates the cost expected to be borne by the patient for incurring the medical service.