Patient-Specific Ankle Cutting Guides for Precise Bone Resection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The accuracy of bone resections during total ankle arthroplasty procedures is compromised due to the small operative area and limited visualization, making it difficult for surgeons to place implant components correctly.

Innovation Solution

Patient-specific ankle cutting guides with mating surfaces that engage non-resected bone surfaces, providing precise registration and guiding cutting instruments along orthogonal or slightly angled planes to accommodate patient anatomy, and including features like pin holes, windows, and alignment sights for enhanced accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional cutting guides are used in TAA procedures, then the device complexity is low, but the manufacturing precision and measurement precision of bone resections deteriorate due to limited visualization and small operative area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone resection accuracyVSAvoidcutting guide system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Patient-specific cutting guides are manufactured before surgery based on preoperative imaging data (CT scans). The guides incorporate patient-specific anatomical surface mappings that are created in advance, allowing the surgical team to plan the exact cutting planes and implant positioning before the actual surgery occurs. This preliminary preparation enables high precision without requiring complex intraoperative adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting guides incorporate physical copies or replicas of the patient's specific anatomical surfaces. By creating a matching surface that mirrors the patient's actual bone geometry, the guide achieves precise registration without requiring complex real-time measurement systems during surgery. The copy approach transfers the complexity to the manufacturing phase rather than the surgical phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If conventional cutting guides are used in TAA procedures, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision deteriorates due to difficulty in visualizing the operative area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut plane alignment accuracyVSAvoidguidance system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patient-specific cutting guides extend beyond the traditional two-dimensional surface contact by incorporating three-dimensional anatomical surface mappings. The guides include depth information and volumetric considerations derived from CT imaging, allowing precise positioning in three-dimensional space without requiring complex intraoperative imaging or navigation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

All measurement and alignment planning is completed before surgery through preoperative imaging and computational design. The cutting guides are manufactured with pre-calculated alignment features based on the patient's specific anatomy, eliminating the need for complex real-time measurement devices during the surgical procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If patient-specific cutting guides are implemented, then the manufacturing precision of bone resections is improved, but the device complexity and ease of manufacture worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone resection accuracyVSAvoidcutting guide fabrication difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patient-specific cutting guides are manufactured in advance using automated CNC machining or 3D printing technologies based on digital models derived from CT scans. By performing the manufacturing before surgery, the complexity of precise fabrication does not interfere with the surgical workflow, and the guides arrive at the operating room ready for immediate use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional manual fabrication methods are replaced with automated manufacturing processes such as CNC machining or additive manufacturing. These automated systems can precisely reproduce the complex patient-specific geometries without requiring skilled manual craftsmanship, thereby maintaining high manufacturing precision while reducing the skill level required for production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12349926B2Patient-specific ankle guide systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 STRYKER EUROPEAN OPERATIONS LIMITED
  • US12349926B2 patent drawing
  • US12349926B2 patent drawing
  • US12349926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes devices for assisting in performing an ankle arthroplasty on a non-resected bone surface of a tibia and/or a talus. The devices may include patient-specific mating surfaces configured to engage the non-resected bone surface in a single relative position relative to the non-resected bone surface. The patient specific nature of the mating surface portion may be generated in the devices prior to the devices being brought into contact with the bone. The devices may include various cutting guides and holes for receiving fasteners to fasten the devices to the bone. The devices may include various features to enhance the stability and/or surface area contact between the devices and the bones.