Pattern Density Analysis for IC Layout Extreme Values

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional pattern density analysis methods fail to accurately calculate local pattern densities, especially missing features that result in errors and omissions, particularly in regions with extreme density values, which can lead to deviations in etching and grinding processes.

Innovation Solution

A pattern density analysis method that constructs inspection windows based on layout pattern attributes, using first and second relevant windows to accurately determine maximum and minimum local pattern densities, thereby avoiding errors and omissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional fixed-step inspection window method is used, then the analysis process is simple, but the measurement precision of local pattern density is poor and extreme values are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal pattern density measurement precisionVSAvoidinspection window construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first identifying all pattern elements and their positions before constructing inspection windows. The system pre-processes the layout data to extract pattern attributes (position, size, shape) and stores them in a data structure that enables efficient window construction. This preliminary preparation allows the system to accurately capture extreme density regions without requiring complex real-time calculations during the actual density measurement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the layout into discrete pattern elements and divides the inspection process into multiple overlapping inspection windows of fixed size. Each window independently calculates pattern density based on the patterns it contains. This segmentation approach allows the system to systematically cover the entire layout while maintaining simple, standardized calculation procedures for each segment, thereby achieving high measurement precision without excessive overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If fixed-step inspection window method is used, then the calculation process is simple, but the reliability of density analysis is reduced due to missed features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity analysis reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by comparing the calculated pattern density in each inspection window against pre-established threshold values and design rules. When a window's density falls outside acceptable ranges or when extreme values are detected, the system generates feedback signals that trigger re-examination of adjacent regions and initiate corrective actions. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable detection of density anomalies while maintaining efficient processing by focusing computational resources only on problematic areas rather than re-analyzing the entire layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adjustment of inspection window parameters based on detected pattern characteristics. When high-density or low-density regions are identified, the system dynamically modifies window size, step size, or detection sensitivity to better capture extreme values. This dynamic approach enhances reliability by adapting to local layout characteristics while preserving productivity through targeted adjustments rather than comprehensive re-analysis of the entire design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional inspection window method is used, then the operation is simple, but the manufacturing precision of etching and grinding processes is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching and grinding process precisionVSAvoiddensity analysis operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual, mechanical inspection procedures with an automated computer-based system that uses digital image processing and algorithmic analysis. The system automatically extracts pattern data, constructs inspection windows, calculates densities, and identifies extreme values without requiring manual intervention. This substitution maintains operational simplicity from the user perspective while dramatically improving manufacturing precision by eliminating human error and enabling sub-pixel accuracy in density measurement, thereby providing more reliable guidance for etching and grinding process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10762272B2Pattern density analysis method
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 SHANGHAI HUALI MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US10762272B2 patent drawing
  • US10762272B2 patent drawing
  • US10762272B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a pattern density analysis method for analyzing a local pattern density of a layout, the method comprising: obtaining a pattern attribute of each layout pattern located on a layout region to be analyzed; setting, for each layout pattern, a relevant window for the layout pattern based on the corresponding pattern attribute; calculating the pattern density of each relevant window; and selecting the maximum value of the pattern densities of the relevant windows as the maximum local pattern density of the layout, and selecting the minimum value of the pattern densities of the relevant windows as the minimum local pattern density of the layout.