Pattern Image Correction via Density-Adaptive Model Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pattern inspection methods for ultrafine circuit patterns in semiconductor and LCD manufacturing face challenges in accurately detecting defects due to image degradation from repeated corrections and difficulties in setting parameters, especially in low-density patterns, leading to inaccuracies and increased errors.

Innovation Solution

An integrated approach combining 2D input/output predictive modeling and bicubic interpolation for image correction, automatically switching between methods based on pattern density, to minimize image degradation and parameter setup complexity, using an image correction device with equation generation, parameter calculation, sub-pixel interpolation, and error comparison units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If repeated execution of image corrections (expansion/shrink correction, swell correction, resize correction) is performed, then image quality improvement is achieved, but accumulated errors occur causing appreciable image degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage correction accuracyVSAvoidimage degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of correction approach from sequential iterative corrections to a single-step predictive model-based correction. The predictive model directly computes the corrected image without repeated iterations, eliminating accumulated errors while maintaining high correction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/iterative correction process with a computational predictive model. Instead of repeatedly applying correction algorithms that accumulate errors, the system uses a predictive model that directly computes the corrected image, substituting iterative mechanics with a direct computational approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple correction processes (alignment, expansion/shrink correction, swell correction, noise averaging) are sequentially performed, then image quality improves, but device complexity and parameter setup difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage correction qualityVSAvoidcorrection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate correction processes (alignment, expansion/shrink correction, swell correction, noise averaging) into a single integrated predictive model-based correction step. This consolidation reduces device complexity while maintaining comprehensive correction functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it performs alignment, expansion/shrink correction, swell correction, and noise reduction in a single operation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated processes for each correction type, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If 2D linear predictive modeling is used for image correction, then correction accuracy improves, but the method fails for extra-low density patterns due to insufficient matrix information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidpattern density adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the correction method dynamic by automatically selecting between predictive modeling and bicubic interpolation based on pattern density. The system adapts its behavior according to the input pattern characteristics, switching from predictive modeling for high-density patterns to bicubic interpolation for low-density patterns, ensuring versatility across different pattern types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the correction method parameter based on pattern density conditions. For patterns with sufficient information content, predictive modeling is used; for patterns with insufficient information (extra-low density), the system switches to bicubic interpolation. This parameter change ensures the method works across the full range of pattern densities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If bicubic interpolation-based alignment in units of subpixels is performed, then sub-pixel alignment accuracy improves, but image degradation occurs from repeated corrections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-pixel alignment precisionVSAvoidimage quality degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces repeated bicubic interpolation operations with a single predictive model-based correction. The predictive model directly computes the corrected image without requiring multiple iterative interpolation steps, thereby achieving high sub-pixel alignment precision while avoiding the image degradation that accumulates from repeated corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7565032B2Image density-adapted automatic mode switchable pattern correction scheme for workpiece inspection
Publication Date: 2009.07.21 KIOXIA CORP
  • US7565032B2 patent drawing
  • US7565032B2 patent drawing
  • US7565032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image correction device for use in a pattern inspection apparatus is disclosed, which has automatic adaptability to variations in density of a pattern image of a workpiece being tested. The device is operable to identify a two-dimensional (2D) linear predictive model parameters from the pattern image of interest and determine the value of a total sum of these identified parameters. This value is then used to switch between a corrected pattern image due to the 2D linear prediction modeling and a corrected image that is interpolated by bicubic interpolation techniques. A pattern inspection method using the image correction technique is also disclosed.