Patterned Transparent Conductors With Low-Visibility Conductive Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transparent conductor technologies, such as ITO coatings, face challenges including high cost, process complexity, energy-intensive methods, and visibility issues due to patterning techniques, which hinder productivity and suitability for applications like touch screens.

Innovation Solution

A patterned transparent conductor is developed with additives embedded into a substrate or coating in a controlled pattern, creating higher and lower sheet conductance portions, allowing for improved electrical conductivity and low visibility, achieved through surface embedding techniques that reduce material usage and topological disorder.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ITO coatings are formed through physical vapor deposition or chemical vapor deposition, then electrical conductivity is improved, but manufacturing cost and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex physical vapor deposition or chemical vapor deposition processes with a simpler solution: applying a transparent conductor composition containing conductive additives (such as metal nanowires, carbon nanotubes, or graphene) through conventional coating techniques. This substitution eliminates the need for specialized deposition equipment and complex process controls while achieving comparable or superior electrical conductivity through the percolating network formed by the conductive additives in the matrix material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If photolithography and etching processes are used to pattern ITO coatings, then conductive traces are formed, but productivity decreases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning precisionVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the patterning function from the coating formation process itself. Instead of forming a continuous ITO coating and then removing material through photolithography and etching, the conductive additives are applied in a patterned manner directly. The patterned application of conductive additives within the transparent conductor composition allows conductive traces to be formed during the coating process, eliminating the need for subsequent photolithography and etching steps, thereby improving productivity and reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional patterning techniques are used for ITO coatings, then conductive traces are formed, but visibility of the patterned conductor increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatterning capabilityVSAvoidvisibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using a matrix material with specific optical properties (high transparency and low haze) to embed the conductive additives. The matrix material is selected to have superior optical characteristics compared to conventional ITO coatings, allowing the conductive traces to be formed with the required patterning while the overall structure maintains low visibility. The conductive additives themselves (such as thin nanowires or nanotubes) have minimal optical impact when dispersed in the transparent matrix, achieving both patterning capability and aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If doped metal oxide coatings are applied to achieve transparency and conductivity, then electrical conductivity is improved, but material cost and equipment investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite materials by combining conductive additives (metal nanowires, carbon nanotubes, or graphene) with a transparent matrix material (polymer, glass, or ceramic). This composite structure achieves electrical conductivity through the conductive network formed by the additives while maintaining transparency through the transparent matrix. The use of conventional coating techniques to apply this composite material reduces equipment investment, and the ability to use less expensive conductive additives compared to doped metal oxides reduces material costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3739598B1Patterned transparent conductors and related manufacturing methods
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 TPK HLDG
  • EP3739598B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3739598B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3739598B1 patent drawingFigure 2C

AI summary

A method for patterning a transparent conductor, wherein additives are embedded into a surface of a substrate or a coating disposed over at least one side of the substrate to form lower sheet conductance portions and higher sheet conductance portions laterally adjacent to the lower sheet conductance portions, shall enable the higher sheet conductance portions to be largely or substantially indistinguishable from the lower conductance portions. To that end, an embedding depth offset is implemented across a horizontal or laterally extending direction along the transparent conductor, wherein the lower conductance portions are formed with additives deeply embedded into the surface or remaining on the surface, and higher conductance portions are formed with additives partially embedded into the surface.